Literature DB >> 16874688

Guidelines audit may overcome disparities in health care: experience of an Italian region.

Mario Salomone1, Caterina Canavese, Daniela Bergamo, Zsuzsanna Hollo, Daniele Damiani, Stefano Maffei, Roberta Fenoglio, Francesca Bermond, Vincenzo Cantaluppi, Marco Quaglia, Giorgio Triolo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A clinical audit is used to verify the application of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Our regional section of the Italian Society of Nephrology was the first to establish a region-based program of clinical audits of compliance with guidelines for treating osteodystrophy and anemia of patients on chronic dialysis. This study summarizes the main results of the 2 audits of the Piemonte region.
METHODS: Structured questionnaires were sent twice to all of the 22 dialysis centers of Piemonte and to the Center of Valle D'Aosta for an Audit on Osteodystrophy (in 2000 and 2004) and for the Audit on Anemia (2003). The questionnaires were meant to evaluate the clinical schedule of treatment relative to calcium-phosphate balance and anemia in dialysis patients.
RESULTS: All centers responded, showing low levels of agreement with the targets of Italian guidelines. In sum, in 2000 only 27% of centers had more than 70% of patients with serum phosphate <5.5 mg/dL, but that rate had increased to 33% in 2004. Only 35% (in 2000) and 40% (in 2004) of the centers had more than 90% of patients with Kt/V >1.2. The Audit on Anemia showed a median of 42% of patients with hemoglobin between 11 and 12 g/dL, and only 2 centers had more than 70% of patients above this target.
CONCLUSIONS: The first result of our pioneering experience was that we found that compliance with minimal levels of care was still inadequate, with regard to hyperphosphatemia, dialysis adequacy and anemia. Nevertheless, the 2nd Audit on Osteodystrophy showed a relative improvement in the results. But, most importantly, this open regional report has encouraged comparisons, and motivated centers to adopt a strategy of understanding, addressing and correcting inadequate levels of care, and furthermore increased satisfaction with the care being offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16874688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  2 in total

1.  Health equity audits: a systematic review of the effectiveness.

Authors:  Kim Robin van Daalen; Fiona Davey; Claire Norman; John Alexander Ford
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Maintaining over time clinical performance targets on anaemia correction in unselected population on chronic dialysis at 20 Italian centres. Data from a retrospective study for a clinical audit.

Authors:  Silvia Soffritti; Giorgia Russo; Stefano Cantelli; Giuseppe Gilli; Luigi Catizone
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.388

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.