Literature DB >> 16874640

Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical site infection rates for several surgical procedures: results from the nosocomial surveillance network in The Netherlands.

Judith Manniën1, Jan C Wille, Ruud L M M Snoeren, Susan van den Hof.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the number of surgical site infections (SSIs) registered after hospital discharge with respect to various surgical procedures and to identify the procedures for which postdischarge surveillance (PDS) is most important.
DESIGN: Prospective SSI surveillance with voluntary PDS. Recommended methods for PDS in the Dutch national nosocomial surveillance network are addition of a special registration card to the outpatient medical record, on which the surgeon notes clinical symptoms and whether a patient developed an SSI according to the definitions; an alternative method is examination of the outpatient medical record.
SETTING: Hospitals participating in the Dutch national nosocomial surveillance network between 1996 and 2004.
RESULTS: We collected data on 131,798 surgical procedures performed in 64 of the 98 Dutch hospitals. PDS was performed according to one of the recommended methods for 31,134 operations (24%) and according to another active method for 32,589 operations (25%), and passive PDS was performed for 68,075 operations (52%). Relatively more SSIs were recorded after discharge for cases in which PDS was performed according to a recommended method (43%), compared with cases in which another active PDS method was used (30%) and cases in which passive PDS was used (25%). The highest rate of SSI after discharge was found for appendectomy (79% of operations), followed by knee prosthesis surgery (64%), mastectomy (61%), femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass (53%), and abdominal hysterectomy (53%).
CONCLUSIONS: For certain surgical procedures, most SSIs develop after discharge. SSI rates will be underestimated if no PDS is performed. We believe we have found a feasible and sensitive method for PDS that, if patients routinely return to the hospital for a postdischarge follow-up visit, might be suitable for use internationally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16874640     DOI: 10.1086/506403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  8 in total

1.  Impact of surgical site infection after colorectal surgery on hospital stay and medical expenditure in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuichi Kashimura; Shinya Kusachi; Toshiro Konishi; Junzo Shimizu; Masato Kusunoki; Masaaki Oka; Toshiro Wakatsuki; Yoshinobu Sumiyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Procedure-specific surgical site infection incidence varies widely within certain National Healthcare Safety Network surgery groups.

Authors:  Mohammed J Saeed; Erik R Dubberke; Victoria J Fraser; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update.

Authors:  Deverick J Anderson; Kelly Podgorny; Sandra I Berríos-Torres; Dale W Bratzler; E Patchen Dellinger; Linda Greene; Ann-Christine Nyquist; Lisa Saiman; Deborah S Yokoe; Lisa L Maragakis; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Primary versus delayed primary skin closure in operated patients due to perforated peptic ulcer disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Arash Mohammadi Tofigh; Shervan Family
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Effectiveness and safety of endoscopy for treatment of surgical site infection: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Hailong Wang; Xinli Dou; Xiangping Hu; Jinsheng Yu; Shaoshan Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Incidence and risk of surgical site infection after adult femoral neck fractures treated by surgery: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Chenni Ji; Yanbin Zhu; Song Liu; Jia Li; Fei Zhang; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Surgical site infections in Italian Hospitals: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Nicola Petrosillo; Cecilia M J Drapeau; Emanuele Nicastri; Lorena Martini; Giuseppe Ippolito; Maria Luisa Moro
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 8.  Highlighting the gaps in quantifying the economic burden of surgical site infections associated with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Katia Iskandar; Massimo Sartelli; Marwan Tabbal; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Fausto Catena; Federico Coccolini; Mainul Haque; Francesco Maria Labricciosa; Ayad Moghabghab; Leonardo Pagani; Pierre Abi Hanna; Christine Roques; Pascale Salameh; Laurent Molinier
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.