OBJECTIVE:Insulin glulisine, a rapid-acting insulin analog, provides prandial insulin replacement. In this study, we compared postprandial blood glucose control after pre- and postmeal insulin glulisine with regular human insulin (RHI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a single-dose, randomized, four-way complete cross-over study, subjects received standardized, 15-min meals, covered by subcutaneous injections of either insulin glulisine (immediately premeal or 15 min postmeal; 0.15 unit/kg per injection) or RHI (30 min or immediately premeal; 0.15 unit/kg per injection). Twenty-one patients with type 1 diabetes (mean age 36.4 years; mean BMI 26.0 kg/m(2)) were enrolled; 20 patients completed the study. Postprandial baseline-subtracted blood glucose exposure, maximum excursion, maximum and minimum blood glucose concentrations, and time to the maximum excursion and minimum concentration were assessed, along with serum insulin concentrations. RESULTS:Lower maximum blood glucose excursion (65 vs. 89 mg/dl), total blood glucose exposure within 2 h (279 vs. 334 mg . h/dl, maximum blood glucose concentration (180 vs. 209 mg/dl), and less time to maximum blood glucose excursion (48 vs. 70 min) were seen with immediately premeal insulin glulisine versus immediately premeal RHI. The maximum serum concentration of insulin glulisine was almost double that of RHI (82 vs. 45 microU/ml), achieved in approximately half the time (55 vs. 97 min). Conversely, insulin glulisine (15 min postmeal) versus RHI (immediately premeal) and RHI (30 min premeal) versus insulin glulisine (immediately premeal) resulted in comparable blood glucose control. CONCLUSIONS:Insulin glulisine renders postprandial glucose disposal closer to physiologic requirements compared with RHI and enables appropriate timing of prandial insulin administration.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Insulinglulisine, a rapid-acting insulin analog, provides prandial insulin replacement. In this study, we compared postprandial blood glucose control after pre- and postmeal insulinglulisine with regular humaninsulin (RHI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a single-dose, randomized, four-way complete cross-over study, subjects received standardized, 15-min meals, covered by subcutaneous injections of either insulinglulisine (immediately premeal or 15 min postmeal; 0.15 unit/kg per injection) or RHI (30 min or immediately premeal; 0.15 unit/kg per injection). Twenty-one patients with type 1 diabetes (mean age 36.4 years; mean BMI 26.0 kg/m(2)) were enrolled; 20 patients completed the study. Postprandial baseline-subtracted blood glucose exposure, maximum excursion, maximum and minimum blood glucose concentrations, and time to the maximum excursion and minimum concentration were assessed, along with serum insulin concentrations. RESULTS: Lower maximum blood glucose excursion (65 vs. 89 mg/dl), total blood glucose exposure within 2 h (279 vs. 334 mg . h/dl, maximum blood glucose concentration (180 vs. 209 mg/dl), and less time to maximum blood glucose excursion (48 vs. 70 min) were seen with immediately premeal insulinglulisine versus immediately premeal RHI. The maximum serum concentration of insulinglulisine was almost double that of RHI (82 vs. 45 microU/ml), achieved in approximately half the time (55 vs. 97 min). Conversely, insulinglulisine (15 min postmeal) versus RHI (immediately premeal) and RHI (30 min premeal) versus insulinglulisine (immediately premeal) resulted in comparable blood glucose control. CONCLUSIONS:Insulinglulisine renders postprandial glucose disposal closer to physiologic requirements compared with RHI and enables appropriate timing of prandial insulin administration.
Authors: Geremia B Bolli; Larry C Deeb; Satish K Garg; John L Leahy; Roger S Mazze; David R Owens; Matthew C Riddle; Phil Southerland; Ellie S Strock Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Joseph L Mann; Caitlin L Maikawa; Anton A A Smith; Abigail K Grosskopf; Sam W Baker; Gillie A Roth; Catherine M Meis; Emily C Gale; Celine S Liong; Santiago Correa; Doreen Chan; Lyndsay M Stapleton; Anthony C Yu; Ben Muir; Shaun Howard; Almar Postma; Eric A Appel Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 17.956