Literature DB >> 16873485

Interpreting anonymous DNA samples from mass disasters--probabilistic forensic inference using genetic markers.

Tien-Ho Lin1, Eugene W Myers, Eric P Xing.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The problem of identifying victims in a mass disaster using DNA fingerprints involves a scale of computation that requires efficient and accurate algorithms. In a typical scenario there are hundreds of samples taken from remains that must be matched to the pedigrees of the alleged victim's surviving relatives. Moreover the samples are often degraded due to heat and exposure. To develop a competent method for this type of forensic inference problem, the complicated quality issues of DNA typing need to be handled appropriately, the matches between every sample and every family must be considered, and the confidence of matches need to be provided.
RESULTS: We present a unified probabilistic framework that efficiently clusters samples, conservatively eliminates implausible sample-pedigree pairings, and handles both degraded samples (missing values) and experimental errors in producing and/or reading a genotype. We present a method that confidently exclude forensically unambiguous sample-family matches from the large hypothesis space of candidate matches, based on posterior probabilistic inference. Due to the high confidentiality of disaster DNA data, simulation experiments are commonly performed and used here for validation. Our framework is shown to be robust to these errors at levels typical in real applications. Furthermore, the flexibility in the probabilistic models makes it possible to extend this framework to include other biological factors such as interdependent markers, mitochondrial sequences, and blood type. AVAILABILITY: The software and data sets are available from the authors upon request.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16873485     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  7 in total

1.  mStruct: inference of population structure in light of both genetic admixing and allele mutations.

Authors:  Suyash Shringarpure; Eric P Xing
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  PADRE: Pedigree-Aware Distant-Relationship Estimation.

Authors:  Jeffrey Staples; David J Witherspoon; Lynn B Jorde; Deborah A Nickerson; Jennifer E Below; Chad D Huff
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Forensic Analysis and Identification Processes in Mass Disasters: Explosion of Gun Powder in the Fireworks Factory.

Authors:  Maricla Marrone; Francesca Tarantino; Alessandra Stellacci; Stefania Lonero Baldassarra; Gerardo Cazzato; Francesco Vinci; Alessandro Dell'Erba
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees.

Authors:  Markus Riester; Peter F Stadler; Konstantin Klemm
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Application of permanents of square matrices for DNA identification in multiple-fatality cases.

Authors:  Maiko Narahara; Keiji Tamaki; Ryo Yamada
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Relationship estimation from whole-genome sequence data.

Authors:  Hong Li; Gustavo Glusman; Hao Hu; Juan Caballero; Robert Hubley; David Witherspoon; Stephen L Guthery; Denise E Mauldin; Lynn B Jorde; Leroy Hood; Jared C Roach; Chad D Huff
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Historical pedigree reconstruction from extant populations using PArtitioning of RElatives (PREPARE).

Authors:  Doron Shem-Tov; Eran Halperin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.