Literature DB >> 16873460

Analysis of sample set enrichment scores: assaying the enrichment of sets of genes for individual samples in genome-wide expression profiles.

Elena Edelman1, Alessandro Porrello, Justin Guinney, Bala Balakumaran, Andrea Bild, Phillip G Febbo, Sayan Mukherjee.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Gene expression profiling experiments in cell lines and animal models characterized by specific genetic or molecular perturbations have yielded sets of genes annotated by the perturbation. These gene sets can serve as a reference base for interrogating other expression datasets. For example, a new dataset in which a specific pathway gene set appears to be enriched, in terms of multiple genes in that set evidencing expression changes, can then be annotated by that reference pathway. We introduce in this paper a formal statistical method to measure the enrichment of each sample in an expression dataset. This allows us to assay the natural variation of pathway activity in observed gene expression data sets from clinical cancer and other studies.
RESULTS: Validation of the method and illustrations of biological insights gleaned are demonstrated on cell line data, mouse models, and cancer-related datasets. Using oncogenic pathway signatures, we show that gene sets built from a model system are indeed enriched in the model system. We employ ASSESS for the use of molecular classification by pathways. This provides an accurate classifier that can be interpreted at the level of pathways instead of individual genes. Finally, ASSESS can be used for cross-platform expression models where data on the same type of cancer are integrated over different platforms into a space of enrichment scores. AVAILABILITY: Versions are available in Octave and Java (with a graphical user interface). Software can be downloaded at http://people.genome.duke.edu/assess.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16873460     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  35 in total

1.  Disruption of a Sirt1-dependent autophagy checkpoint in the prostate results in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesion formation.

Authors:  Michael J Powell; Mathew C Casimiro; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Xiaohong He; Wen-Shuz Yeow; Chenguang Wang; Peter A McCue; Michael W McBurney; Richard G Pestell
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Patterns of cell signaling pathway activation that characterize mammary development.

Authors:  Eran R Andrechek; Seiichi Mori; Rachel E Rempel; Jeffrey T Chang; Joseph R Nevins
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Predicting relapse in patients with medulloblastoma by integrating evidence from clinical and genomic features.

Authors:  Pablo Tamayo; Yoon-Jae Cho; Aviad Tsherniak; Heidi Greulich; Lauren Ambrogio; Netteke Schouten-van Meeteren; Tianni Zhou; Allen Buxton; Marcel Kool; Matthew Meyerson; Scott L Pomeroy; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Graph- and rule-based learning algorithms: a comprehensive review of their applications for cancer type classification and prognosis using genomic data.

Authors:  Saurav Mallik; Zhongming Zhao
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  Modeling cancer progression via pathway dependencies.

Authors:  Elena J Edelman; Justin Guinney; Jen-Tsan Chi; Phillip G Febbo; Sayan Mukherjee
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Functional analysis: evaluation of response intensities--tailoring ANOVA for lists of expression subsets.

Authors:  Fabrice Berger; Bertrand De Meulder; Anthoula Gaigneaux; Sophie Depiereux; Eric Bareke; Michael Pierre; Benoît De Hertogh; Mauro Delorenzi; Eric Depiereux
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The limitations of simple gene set enrichment analysis assuming gene independence.

Authors:  Pablo Tamayo; George Steinhardt; Arthur Liberzon; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  The milk protein α-casein functions as a tumor suppressor via activation of STAT1 signaling, effectively preventing breast cancer tumor growth and metastasis.

Authors:  Gloria Bonuccelli; Remedios Castello-Cros; Franco Capozza; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Zhao Lin; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Jiao Xuanmao; Diana Whitaker-Menezes; Anthony Howell; Michael P Lisanti; Federica Sotgia
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Caveolin-1 (P132L), a common breast cancer mutation, confers mammary cell invasiveness and defines a novel stem cell/metastasis-associated gene signature.

Authors:  Gloria Bonuccelli; Mathew C Casimiro; Federica Sotgia; Chenguang Wang; Manran Liu; Sanjay Katiyar; Jie Zhou; Elliott Dew; Franco Capozza; Kristin M Daumer; Carlo Minetti; Janet N Milliman; Fabien Alpy; Marie-Christine Rio; Catherine Tomasetto; Isabelle Mercier; Neal Flomenberg; Philippe G Frank; Richard G Pestell; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  GSMA: Gene Set Matrix Analysis, An Automated Method for Rapid Hypothesis Testing of Gene Expression Data.

Authors:  Chris Cheadle; Tonya Watkins; Jinshui Fan; Marc A Williams; Steven Georas; John Hall; Antony Rosen; Kathleen C Barnes
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2009-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.