BACKGROUND: The early identification of patients at risk for the development of clinical heart failure (HF) is a new challenge in an effort to improve outcomes. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated whether the combination of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements (Triage BNP test, Biosite Diagnostics) and echocardiography would effectively stratify patients with new symptoms in a cost-effective HF program aimed at early diagnosis of mild HF. A total of 252 patients were referred by 100 general practitioners. RESULTS: Among the study population, the median BNP value was 78 ng/L (range, 5-1491 ng/L). BNP concentrations were lower among patients without heart disease [median 15 ng/L (range, 5-167 ng/L); n = 96] than among patients with confirmed HF [median, 165 ng/L (22-1491 ng/L); n = 157; Mann-Whitney U-test, 12.3; P <0.001]. Patients were grouped into diastolic dysfunction [BNP, 195 (223) ng/L], systolic dysfunction [BNP, 290 (394) ng/L], and both systolic and diastolic dysfunction [BNP, 776 (506) ng/L]. In this model, a cutoff value of 50 ng/L BNP increases the diagnostic accuracy in predicting mild HF, avoiding 41 echocardiograms per 100 patients studied, with a net saving of 14% of total costs. CONCLUSIONS: Blood BNP concentrations, in a cost effective targeted screening, can play an important role in diagnosing mild HF and stratifying patients into risk groups of cardiac dysfunction.
BACKGROUND: The early identification of patients at risk for the development of clinical heart failure (HF) is a new challenge in an effort to improve outcomes. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated whether the combination of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements (Triage BNP test, Biosite Diagnostics) and echocardiography would effectively stratify patients with new symptoms in a cost-effective HF program aimed at early diagnosis of mild HF. A total of 252 patients were referred by 100 general practitioners. RESULTS: Among the study population, the median BNP value was 78 ng/L (range, 5-1491 ng/L). BNP concentrations were lower among patients without heart disease [median 15 ng/L (range, 5-167 ng/L); n = 96] than among patients with confirmed HF [median, 165 ng/L (22-1491 ng/L); n = 157; Mann-Whitney U-test, 12.3; P <0.001]. Patients were grouped into diastolic dysfunction [BNP, 195 (223) ng/L], systolic dysfunction [BNP, 290 (394) ng/L], and both systolic and diastolic dysfunction [BNP, 776 (506) ng/L]. In this model, a cutoff value of 50 ng/L BNP increases the diagnostic accuracy in predicting mild HF, avoiding 41 echocardiograms per 100 patients studied, with a net saving of 14% of total costs. CONCLUSIONS: Blood BNP concentrations, in a cost effective targeted screening, can play an important role in diagnosing mild HF and stratifying patients into risk groups of cardiac dysfunction.
Authors: Rogier F Kievit; Aisha Gohar; Arno W Hoes; Michiel L Bots; Evelien Es van Riet; Yvonne van Mourik; Loes Cm Bertens; Leandra Jm Boonman-de Winter; Hester M den Ruijter; Frans H Rutten Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 7.804