Literature DB >> 16872865

Oral chromium(VI) does not affect the frequency of micronuclei in hematopoietic cells of adult mice and of transplacentally exposed fetuses.

Silvio De Flora1, Marietta Iltcheva, Roumen M Balansky.   

Abstract

Chromium(VI) compounds are genotoxic in a variety of cellular systems. Their potential carcinogenicity is affected by toxicokinetic patterns restricting bioavailability to certain targets, and by metabolic pathways affecting interaction of chromate-derived reactive species with DNA. Epidemiological data indicate that chromium(VI) can be carcinogenic to the human respiratory tract following inhalation at doses that are only achieved in certain occupational settings. However, concern has been raised that adverse effects may also result from oral intake. In order to further explore this issue, we performed studies in BDF1 and Swiss mice of both genders and various age. Sodium dichromate dihydrate and potassium dichromate were administered either with the drinking water, up to a concentration of 500 mg chromium(VI)/l for up to 210 consecutive days, or in a single intragastric dose of 17.7 mg/kg body weight. Under these conditions, no increase of the micronucleus frequency was observed in either bone marrow or peripheral blood erythrocytes. Conversely, the same compounds induced a clastogenic damage following intraperitoneal injection, which by-passes detoxification mechanisms. In addition, due to the hypothesis that susceptibility may be increased during the period of embryogenesis, we treated pregnant mice, up to a concentration of 10mg chromium(VI)/l drinking water. There was no effect on the numbers of fetuses/dam and on body weight of fetuses. Again, no toxic or genotoxic effect was observed either in bone marrow of pregnant mice or in liver and peripheral blood of their fetuses. Thus, even at doses that largely exceed drinking water standards (up to 10,000 times) or by massive intragastric administration, chromium(VI) is not genotoxic to hematopoietic cells of either adult mice or transplacentally exposed fetuses. These conclusions are consistent with the poor toxicity and lack of carcinogenicity of oral chromium(VI), and are mechanistically explained by the high efficiency of chromium(VI) detoxification processes in the gastrointestinal tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16872865     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  6 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the mode of action underlying development of rodent small intestinal tumors following oral exposure to hexavalent chromium and relevance to humans.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Deborah M Proctor; Mina Suh; Laurie C Haws; Christopher R Kirman; Mark A Harris
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 2.  Oral Chromium Exposure and Toxicity.

Authors:  Hong Sun; Jason Brocato; Max Costa
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Application of the U.S. EPA mode of action Framework for purposes of guiding future research: a case study involving the oral carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Laurie C Haws; Mark A Harris; Nicole M Gatto; Deborah M Proctor
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Assessment of Mechanistic Data for Hexavalent Chromium-Induced Rodent Intestinal Cancer Using the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens.

Authors:  Grace A Chappell; Daniele S Wikoff; Chad M Thompson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Comparison of Toxicity and Recovery in the Duodenum of B6C3F1 Mice Following Treatment with Intestinal Carcinogens Captan, Folpet, and Hexavalent Chromium.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Jeffrey C Wolf; Alene McCoy; Mina Suh; Deborah M Proctor; Christopher R Kirman; Laurie C Haws; Mark A Harris
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Integration of mechanistic and pharmacokinetic information to derive oral reference dose and margin-of-exposure values for hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Christopher R Kirman; Sean M Hays; Mina Suh; Seneca E Harvey; Deborah M Proctor; Julia E Rager; Laurie C Haws; Mark A Harris
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.446

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.