Literature DB >> 16872791

Assessment of needs of men for decision support on male sterilization.

Abdoul Baldé1, France Légaré, Michel Labrecque.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the needs of men for decision support on male sterilization.
METHODS: Forty-two men facing a decision about undergoing a vasectomy or not and 11 physicians who perform vasectomy were interviewed to assess the sources of difficulty in this decision-making process. On the day of their vasectomy, 209 men completed the decisional conflict scale (DCS) and a knowledge test.
RESULTS: Sources of difficulty about the decision to have a vasectomy or not included: lack of information about risks and benefits, clarification of personal values concerning parenthood after the vasectomy, and undue pressure from partner. On the day of their vasectomy, only 1.9% (95% confidence interval 0.5-4.8%) of men had unresolved decisional conflict. However, most men scored poorly on their knowledge test mean score (58.2+/-13.5%).
CONCLUSION: Men facing the decision about having a vasectomy or not would benefit from a decision support intervention that would address conflicting information and clarification of values. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health professionals should provide decision support to men facing the decision about having a vasectomy or not. A decision aid on male sterilization would be useful in this respect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16872791     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  4 in total

1.  Assessing Vasectomy-Related Information on YouTube: An Analysis of the Quality, Understandability, and Actionability of Information.

Authors:  Jacob J Lang; Zane Giffen; Stephen Hong; Jonathan Demeter; Ahmed El-Zawahry; Puneet Sindhwani; Obi Ekwenna
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr

2.  Mexican Men's View of Vasectomy.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Marván; Yamilet Ehrenzweig; Dianeth Hernández-Aguilera
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-06-23

3.  Decisional conflict among patients who accept or decline participation in phase I oncology studies.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Kevin P Weinfurt; Damon M Seils; Li Lin; Caroline B Burnett; Kevin A Schulman; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Shared decision-making in gout treatment: a national study of rheumatology provider opinion and practice.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John S Richards; Elizabeth Chang; Karine Toupin-April; Jennifer L Barton
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.980

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.