| Literature DB >> 16872518 |
Zenija Roja1, Valdis Kalkis, Arved Vain, Henrijs Kalkis, Maija Eglite.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This research work is dedicated to occupational health problems caused by ergonomic risks. The research object was road building industry, where workers have to work very intensively, have long work hours, are working in forced/constrained work postures and overstrain during the work specific parts of their bodies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the work heaviness degree and to estimate the muscle fatigue of workers after one week work cycle. The study group consisted of 10 road construction and maintenance workers and 10 pavers aged between 20 and 60 years.Entities:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16872518 PMCID: PMC1550413 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6673-1-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol ISSN: 1745-6673 Impact factor: 2.646
Background factors of the subjects, mean, standard deviation (SD) and range
| Age (years) | 40 ± 4 | 20–60 | 30 ± 4 | 30–60 |
| Height (cm) | 180 ± 5 | 173–187 | 172 ± 7 | 165–180 |
| Weight (kg) | 81 ± 9 | 65–97 | 76 ± 6 | 60–92 |
| Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) | 25 ± 6 | 17–36 | 25 ± 3 | 19–28 |
| Rest heart rate (beats/min) | 67 ± 7 | 56–78 | 62 ± 6 | 50–74 |
Work heaviness classification in terms of energy expenditure
| Light work | I | Light work | I | 2.0 – 4.9 | 1.5 – 3.4 |
| Moderate work | II | Permissible work | II | 5.0 – 7.4 | 3.5 – 5.4 |
| Hard work | III | Moderate work | II.1 | 7.5 – 9.9 | 5.5 – 7.4 |
| Very hard work | IV | Hard work | II.2 | 10.0 – 12.4 | 7.5 – 9.4 |
| Ultimate work | V | Excessively hard work | III | more 12.5 | more 9.5 |
Figure 1Schematic drawing of myotonometer.
Figure 2Myotonometrical testing of m. gastrocnemius caput mediale.
Figure 3Waveforms of acceleration (a), velocity (v), and displacement (s), acquired in the process of damped natural oscillation performed by the myometer testing end.
Workers' heart rate (HR), Pearson's correlation (r), Cohen's Kappa (k), percentage of the heart rate range (%HRR), energy expenditure (E), the rate of perceived exertion (RPE, scale 6–20), and work heaviness category (WHC). Road workers (n = 10), pavers (n = 10).
| Road workers | 125 ± 14 | 108–160 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 52 ± 8 | 8,1 ± 1.5 | 15 ± 2 (13–17) | Hard work |
| Pavers | 116 ± 13 | 82–150 | 0.92 | 0.59 | 42 ± 6 | 7.2 ± 1.1 | 12 ± 2 (11–13) | Moderate work |
Percent of workers whose muscle frequency exceeds the norm (> 16 Hz) after the work week cycle, Pearson's correlation (r), and Cohen's Kappa (k)
| 60 | 0.78 | 0.34 | 28 | 0.68 | 0.59 | |
| 60 | 0.78 | 0.21 | 30 | 0.70 | 0.35 | |
| 25 | 0.82 | 0.50 | 80 | 0.80 | 0.54 | |
| 50 | 0.85 | 0.35 | 90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | |
| 25 | 0.88 | 0.20 | 85 | 0.78 | 0.33 | |
Figure 4Results of the regression analysis of m. extensor digitorum frequency and stiffness during consecutive 6 work days in road workers.
Figure 5Illustration of frequency changing in separate muscle groups while performing the different kind of work at the beginning and at the end of the work week – for workers who are not to be able to adapt with the workload and whose muscle frequency exceeds the norm (11 up to 16 Hz, exist for each muscle individually) after the work week cycle.
Percent of workers whose muscle stiffness exceeds the norm (> 300 N/m) after the work week cycle, Pearson's correlation (r), and Cohen's Kappa (k)
| 85 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 30 | 0.68 | 0.25 | |
| 85 | 0.69 | 0.19 | 35 | 0.70 | 0.30 | |
| 12 | 0.76 | 0.54 | 60 | 0.80 | 0.51 | |
| 60 | 0.67 | 0.43 | 100 | 0.89 | 0.49 | |
| 25 | 0.55 | 0.25 | 90 | 0.78 | 0.28 | |
Percent of workers with differences in their muscle tone (categories I...III) after one week work cycle depending on the length of occupational service in the given road building company
| > | |||||||||
| Road workers (n = 70) | I – 10% | 0.68 | 0.48 | I – 12% | 0.68 | 0.45 | I – 8% | 0.68 | 12.0 |
| II – 13% | 0.68 | 0.41 | II – 17% | 0.68 | 0.35 | II – 12% | 0.68 | 62.8 | |
| III – 77% | 0.68 | 0.53 | III – 70% | 0.68 | 0.25 | III – 80% | 0.68 | 89.3 | |
| Pavers (n = 25) | I – 14% | 0.68 | 0.34 | I – 10% | 0.68 | 0.25 | I – 11% | 0.68 | 10.0 |
| II – 40% | 0.68 | 0.33 | II – 30% | 0.68 | 0.52 | II – 40% | 0.68 | 18.1 | |
| III – 46% | 0.68 | 0.49 | III – 60% | 0.68 | 0.55 | III – 49% | 0.68 | 78.4 | |