Literature DB >> 16871622

Genetic inducible fate mapping in mouse: establishing genetic lineages and defining genetic neuroanatomy in the nervous system.

Alexandra L Joyner1, Mark Zervas.   

Abstract

A fascinating aspect of developmental biology is how organs are assembled in three dimensions over time. Fundamental to understanding organogenesis is the ability to determine when and where specific cell types are generated, the lineage of each cell, and how cells move to reside in their final position. Numerous methods have been developed to mark and follow the fate of cells in various model organisms used by developmental biologists, but most are not readily applicable to mouse embryos in utero because they involve physical marking of cells through injection of tracers. The advent of sophisticated transgenic and gene targeting techniques, combined with the use of site-specific recombinases, has revolutionized fate mapping studies in mouse. Furthermore, using genetic fate mapping to mark cells has opened up the possibility of addressing fundamental questions that cannot be studied with traditional methods of fate mapping in other organisms. Specifically, genetic fate mapping allows both the relationship between embryonic gene expression and cell fate (genetic lineage) to be determined, as well as the link between gene expression domains and anatomy (genetic anatomy) to be established. In this review, we present the ever-evolving development of genetic fate mapping techniques in mouse, especially the recent advance of Genetic Inducible Fate Mapping. We then review recent studies in the nervous system (focusing on the anterior hindbrain) as well as in the limb and with adult stem cells to highlight fundamental developmental processes that can be discovered using genetic fate mapping approaches. We end with a look toward the future at a powerful new approach that combines genetic fate mapping with cellular phenotyping alleles to study cell morphology, physiology, and function using examples from the nervous system. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16871622     DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.20884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  101 in total

1.  Neurogenin 2 regulates progenitor cell-cycle progression and Purkinje cell dendritogenesis in cerebellar development.

Authors:  Marta Florio; Ketty Leto; Luca Muzio; Andrea Tinterri; Aurora Badaloni; Laura Croci; Paola Zordan; Valeria Barili; Ilaria Albieri; François Guillemot; Ferdinando Rossi; G Giacomo Consalez
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Photomodulatable fluorescent proteins for imaging cell dynamics and cell fate.

Authors:  Sonja Nowotschin; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Role of canonical Wnt signaling/ß-catenin via Dermo1 in cranial dermal cell development.

Authors:  Thu H Tran; Andrew Jarrell; Gabriel E Zentner; Adrienne Welsh; Isaac Brownell; Peter C Scacheri; Radhika Atit
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Dynamic FoxG1 expression coordinates the integration of multipolar pyramidal neuron precursors into the cortical plate.

Authors:  Goichi Miyoshi; Gord Fishell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Dynamic expression pattern of Sonic hedgehog in developing cochlear spiral ganglion neurons.

Authors:  Zhiyong Liu; Thomas Owen; Lingli Zhang; Jian Zuo
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 6.  Molecular neuroanatomy's "Three Gs": a primer.

Authors:  Susan M Dymecki; Jun Chul Kim
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Bifurcation of axons from cranial sensory neurons is disabled in the absence of Npr2-induced cGMP signaling.

Authors:  Gohar Ter-Avetisyan; Fritz G Rathjen; Hannes Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages.

Authors:  Gloria S Kwon; Manuel Viotti; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Defects in the cerebella of conditional Neurod1 null mice correlate with effective Tg(Atoh1-cre) recombination and granule cell requirements for Neurod1 for differentiation.

Authors:  Ning Pan; Israt Jahan; Jacqueline E Lee; Bernd Fritzsch
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Cre fate mapping reveals lineage specific defects in neuronal migration with loss of Pitx2 function in the developing mouse hypothalamus and subthalamic nucleus.

Authors:  Jennifer M Skidmore; John D Cramer; James F Martin; Donna M Martin
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.