Literature DB >> 16871220

Parental authority, patient's best interest and refusal of resuscitation at borderline gestational age.

M R Mercurio1.   

Abstract

Potential conflict exists when parents refuse a medical intervention for their child that the physician feels obligated to provide. For the anticipated delivery of a preterm newborn, this conflict might exist if the parents refuse resuscitation. At borderline viability, most neonatologists are likely to respect the parents' wishes. However, there will be some gestational age threshold above which the physician will feel compelled to resuscitate despite parental refusal, and will be ethically justified in doing so. The location of that threshold should be determined by the application of sound ethical reasoning, rather than relying on habit or arbitrary standards. That reasoning should include an honest assessment of the benefits and burdens to the child, short-term and long-term, of attempted resuscitation, made in light of relevant mortality and morbidity data. However, a rational analysis will also require consideration of whether the patient's best interest standard should be strictly applied, or whether the interests of others, such as family members, should also be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16871220     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  2 in total

Review 1.  Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (6 of 7): ethical considerations.

Authors:  Maureen Kelley; Craig E Rubens
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 2.  The theorisation of 'best interests' in bioethical accounts of decision-making.

Authors:  Giles Birchley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.