Literature DB >> 16871108

Evaluating the validity of a bedside method of detecting hypoglycemia in children.

Jerome Boluwaji Elutayo Elusiyan1, Olugbenga O Adeodu, Ebunoluwa A Adejuyigbe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypoglycemia in the pediatric age group is a common finding associated with a wide variety of disorders. It often presents urgent diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In the tropics where facilities for laboratory evaluation are inadequate and inefficient, there is need to evaluate alternative methods of diagnosis. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to validate the glucometer method of assessing hypoglycemia in pediatric patients.
METHODOLOGY: Four hundred fifty-three consecutively admitted patients were recruited into the study. After a detailed history and thorough physical examination, 2 mL of blood was obtained from each patient. A drop was put on the test strip, and plasma glucose level read off a glucometer. The remainder was sent to the laboratory for comparative plasma glucose determination by the glucose oxidase method. Hypoglycemia was defined as plasma glucose less than 2.5 mmol/L (<45 mg/dL).
RESULTS: Out of the 453 studied, only 392 (86.5%) had complete results and were included in the analysis. Thirty-eight (9.7%) were hypoglycemic by the glucometer method, but only 25 (6.4%) of them were hypoglycemic by the laboratory method. The glucometer was found to be highly sensitive and specific, and its results compares favorably with the laboratory values. The glucometer gave a predictive index of a positive test as 63.12% and of a negative test as 99.72%. It however leads to overdiagnosis of hypoglycemia.
CONCLUSIONS: The glucometer was found to be highly sensitive and specific, and its result correlates significantly well with the laboratory method. The glucometer method for blood sugar determination in emergency cases is highly recommended in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16871108     DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000227382.61390.0c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic point-of-care tests in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Paul K Drain; Emily P Hyle; Farzad Noubary; Kenneth A Freedberg; Douglas Wilson; William R Bishai; William Rodriguez; Ingrid V Bassett
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 2.  Cognitive dysfunction and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Christopher T Kodl; Elizabeth R Seaquist
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Childhood dysglycemia: prevalence and outcome in a referral hospital.

Authors:  Emercia Sambany; Eric Pussard; Christian Rajaonarivo; Honoré Raobijaona; Hubert Barennes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Self-tests for influenza: an empirical ethics investigation.

Authors:  Benedict Rumbold; Clare Wenham; James Wilson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.