Literature DB >> 16870841

High stiffness of human digital flexor tendons is suited for precise finger positional control.

Samuel R Ward1, Gregory J Loren, Scott Lundberg, Richard L Lieber.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to define the biomechanical properties of the human digital flexor tendons and to compare these biomechanical properties to other muscle-tendon units in the forearm. Mechanical measurements were performed on fresh-frozen tendons under physiological load and temperature conditions. Loads were determined by first measuring the physiological cross-sectional area of each digital belly of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and estimating maximum tension (P(o)) of that specific muscle head. Loading each tendon to the appropriate P(o) resulted in no significant difference in tendon strain among any of the tendons within each muscle (P > 0.05; digits 2-5) or between muscle types (FDP vs. FDS). The one exception to this finding was that a significantly higher strain at Po was observed in the FDP tendon to the small finger (P < 0.05). Average absolute strains observed for the FDP and FDS tendons (1.20 +/- 0.38%, mean +/- SD; n = 39) were significantly lower than those observed previously in a study of the prime movers of the wrist. The measured strain of approximately 1.5% was less than half of that predicted to occur in muscles of this architectural design. Modeling sarcomere shortening magnitudes during FDP or FDS contraction yielded a value of only 0.10 microm, which would have a negligible effect on the force generating capacity of these muscles. Thus the high stiffness of the digital flexor tendons suits them well for fine positional control and would render their muscle spindles quite sensitive to length perturbations at the fingertips.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16870841     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00284.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Muscle contracture and passive mechanics in cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Richard L Lieber; Jan Fridén
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-12-20

2.  Biaxial strain and variable stiffness in aponeuroses.

Authors:  Emanuel Azizi; Thomas J Roberts
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Some Challenges of Playing with Power: Does Complex Energy Flow Constrain Neuromuscular Performance?

Authors:  Thomas J Roberts
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Mechanical strength of the side-to-side versus Pulvertaft weave tendon repair.

Authors:  Stephen H M Brown; Eric R Hentzen; Alan Kwan; Samuel R Ward; Jan Fridén; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Mechanical feasibility of immediate mobilization of the brachioradialis muscle after tendon transfer.

Authors:  Jan Fridén; Matthew C Shillito; Eric F Chehab; John J Finneran; Samuel R Ward; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  The morphology of the masticatory apparatus facilitates muscle force production at wide jaw gapes in tree-gouging common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  C M Eng; S R Ward; C J Vinyard; A B Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Computing muscle, ligament, and osseous contributions to the elbow varus moment during baseball pitching.

Authors:  James H Buffi; Katie Werner; Tom Kepple; Wendy M Murray
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Passive elongation of muscle fascicles in human muscles with short and long tendons.

Authors:  Jeanette M Thom; Joanna Diong; Peter W Stubbs; Robert D Herbert
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-12

9.  A novel experimental design for the measurement of metacarpal bone loading and deformation and fingertip force.

Authors:  Szu-Ching Lu; Evie E Vereecke; Alexander Synek; Dieter H Pahr; Tracy L Kivell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.