| Literature DB >> 16869944 |
Anthony S Dawson1, Santo C Cardaci.
Abstract
An increasingly frequent dilemma in restorative dentistry is the question of whether to retain a badly damaged tooth and restore it, or to remove and possibly replace it. Given the ethical difficulties inherent in testing this question, it is unlikely that we will ever see a properly designed clinical trial that will provide an answer. One of the most strongly debated components of this question is whether endodontic treatment and restoration can compete with a dental implant-borne prosthesis in terms of longevity and success. In the current paper, the authors will attempt to: (i) answer this question based on our current understanding of the dental literature; and (ii) provide practitioners with guidelines that might be applied to their daily practices.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16869944 DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2006.00019.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aust Endod J ISSN: 1329-1947 Impact factor: 1.659