Literature DB >> 16869056

The effects of speech and speechlike maskers on unaided and aided speech recognition in persons with hearing loss.

Benjamin W Y Hornsby1, Todd A Ricketts, Earl E Johnson.   

Abstract

Speech understanding in noise is affected by both the energetic and informational masking components of the background noise. In addition, when the background noise is everyday speech, the relative contributions of the energetic and informational masking components to the overall difficulties in understanding speech are unclear. This study estimated informational masking effects, in conversational speech settings, on the speech understanding of persons with and without hearing loss. The benefits and limitations of amplification in settings containing both informational and energetic masking components were also explored. Speech recognition was assessed in the presence of two types of maskers (speech and noise) that varied in the amount of informational masking they were expected to produce. Persons with hearing loss were tested both unaided and aided. Study results suggest that background noise, consisting of individual talkers, results in both informational and energetic masking. In addition, the benefits of amplification are limited when the background noise contains both informational and energetic masking components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16869056     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.6.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  10 in total

1.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Initial development of a spatially separated speech-in-noise and localization training program.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Influence of hearing loss on children's identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Andrea Hillock-Dunn; Nicole Duncan; Patricia A Roush; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.

Authors:  Suzanne Carr Levy; Daniel J Freed; Michael Nilsson; Brian C J Moore; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Cognitive and neural predictors of speech comprehension in noisy backgrounds in older adults.

Authors:  Megan C Fitzhugh; Sydney Y Schaefer; Leslie C Baxter; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Revisiting Auditory Profiling: Can Cognitive Factors Improve the Prediction of Aided Speech-in-Noise Outcome?

Authors:  Mengfan Wu; Stine Christiansen; Michal Fereczkowski; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

8.  Mitigation of informational masking in individuals with single-sided deafness by integrated bone conduction hearing aids.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Stephen Bowditch; Yinda Liu; Marc Eisen; John K Niparko
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Influence of Three Auditory Profiles on Aided Speech Perception in Different Noise Scenarios.

Authors:  Mengfan Wu; Oscar M Cañete; Jesper Hvass Schmidt; Michal Fereczkowski; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Telephone Usage and Cochlear Implant: Auditory Training Benefits.

Authors:  Aline Faria de Sousa; Ana Claudia Martinho de Carvalho; Maria Ines Vieira Couto; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Carla Gentile Matas; Debora Maria Befi-Lopes
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.