Victoria Mountford1, Anne Haase, Glenn Waller. 1. Eating Disorders Service, South West London and St. George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, England. vicki.mountford@swlstg-tr.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Body checking behaviors appear to be a manifestation of the cognitive distortions that are central to the maintenance of the eating disorders. However, there is little understanding of the cognitions that drive these behaviors. This study validates a novel measure of such cognitions (Body Checking Cognitions Scale [BCCS]) and examines the association between body checking cognitions, body checking behaviors, and general eating pathology. METHOD: Eighty-four eating-disordered women and 205 non-eating-disordered women each completed measures of body checking behaviors, body checking cognitions and eating pathology. A further 130 nonclinical women completed the measures to provide an independent cross-validation sample for the BCCS. RESULTS: The BCCS was reliable and valid, and cross-validation with an independent sample confirmed the four-factor structure. Eating-disordered women were significantly more likely to experience body checking cognitions than healthy women. Those cognitions were associated with a significant proportion of variance in eating pathology, over and above the variance explained by checking behaviors. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for a range of beliefs underlying body checking behavior in eating-disordered women, suggesting that interventions addressing those beliefs might be pertinent in some cases. Copyright 2006 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Body checking behaviors appear to be a manifestation of the cognitive distortions that are central to the maintenance of the eating disorders. However, there is little understanding of the cognitions that drive these behaviors. This study validates a novel measure of such cognitions (Body Checking Cognitions Scale [BCCS]) and examines the association between body checking cognitions, body checking behaviors, and general eating pathology. METHOD: Eighty-four eating-disorderedwomen and 205 non-eating-disorderedwomen each completed measures of body checking behaviors, body checking cognitions and eating pathology. A further 130 nonclinical women completed the measures to provide an independent cross-validation sample for the BCCS. RESULTS: The BCCS was reliable and valid, and cross-validation with an independent sample confirmed the four-factor structure. Eating-disorderedwomen were significantly more likely to experience body checking cognitions than healthy women. Those cognitions were associated with a significant proportion of variance in eating pathology, over and above the variance explained by checking behaviors. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for a range of beliefs underlying body checking behavior in eating-disorderedwomen, suggesting that interventions addressing those beliefs might be pertinent in some cases. Copyright 2006 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: A Trejger Kachani; P Brunfentrinker Hochgraf; S Brasiliano; A L Rodrigues Barbosa; T A Cordás; M A Conti Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Leonie Wilhelm; Andrea S Hartmann; Martin Cordes; Manuel Waldorf; Silja Vocks Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Katherine Schaumberg; Erin E Reilly; Sasha Gorrell; Cheri A Levinson; Nicholas R Farrell; Tiffany A Brown; Kathryn M Smith; Lauren M Schaefer; Jamal H Essayli; Ann F Haynos; Lisa M Anderson Journal: Clin Psychol Rev Date: 2020-11-11
Authors: Angela Nogueira Neves Betanho Campana; Viren Swami; Carolina Mie Kawagosi Onodera; Dirceu da Silva; Maria da Consolação Gomes Cunha Fernandes Tavares Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240