Literature DB >> 16868684

Radiation exposure to the patient and operating room personnel during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Geeta Kumari1, Pratik Kumar, Pankaj Wadhwa, Monish Aron, Narmada P Gupta, Prem N Dogra.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The increased use of fluoroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) places the urologist and operating room personnel at an occupational risk for measurable radiation exposure. We evaluated the degree of radiation exposure received by the patient and operating room personnel at our endourology facility during PCNL. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: The incident radiation dose to the patient and the urologist during 50 consecutive PCNL procedures was monitored using lithium fluoride thermo-luminescent dosimeter chips (TLD chips). A hand held radiation survey meter was used to measure the radiation in air at different positions occupied by various operating room personnel. The approximate distances of the various personnel from the X-ray tube were also measured.
RESULTS: PCNL was performed upon 35 males and 15 females. The average time for the procedure was 75 minutes (range: 30-150 min). The mean fluoroscopy screening time during the procedure was 6.04 min (range 1.8-12.16 min) with a mean fluoroscopy tube potential of 68 kVp and a mean tube current of 2.76 mA. The mean radiation exposure dose to the patient was 0.56 mSv (SD +/- 0.35), while the mean incident radiation exposure to the finger of the urologist was 0.28 mSv (SD +/- 0.13).
CONCLUSION: The various operating room personnel are within safe radiation dose limits during PCNL. Efficient fluoroscopy further reduces the radiation scatter. All occupational personnel should 'achieve as low as reasonably achievable' dose by adhering to good practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16868684     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-005-4972-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  11 in total

1.  Radiation protection in percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  W G Bowsher; P Blott; H N Whitfield
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1992-03

2.  Radiation risk to the urologist during endourologic procedures, and a new shield that reduces exposure.

Authors:  J G Giblin; J Rubenstein; A Taylor; J Pahira
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Consensus conference. Prevention and treatment of kidney stones.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Radiation dose to urological surgeons during X-ray fluoroscopy for percutaneous stone extraction.

Authors:  J Law; J A Inglis; D A Tolley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Radiation dose to patient and staff during percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  P N Rao; K Faulkner; J K Sweeney; D L Asbury; P Sambrook; N J Blacklock
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1987-06

6.  A "flagpole" lead-glass screen for radiographic procedures.

Authors:  K R Thomson; J Brammall; B C Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Radiation exposure to patient and urologist during percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  W H Bush; G E Brannen; R P Gibbons; R J Correa; J S Elder
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Radiation dose to patients and personnel during fluoroscopy at percutaneous renal stone extraction.

Authors:  K Geterud; A Larsson; S Mattsson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Radiation dose to personnel during percutaneous renal calculus removal.

Authors:  W H Bush; D Jones; G E Brannen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Radiation protection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a new urologic surgery radiation shield.

Authors:  Ronald M Yang; Thomas Morgan; Gary C Bellman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Is radiation exposure during sacral neuromodulation within safety limits?

Authors:  Ali Alabbad; Elie Abdo; Magdy Hassouna
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Management of stone disease in infants.

Authors:  Mujdem Nur Azili; Fatma Ozturk; Mihriban Inozu; Fatma Şemsa Çayci; Banu Acar; Sengul Ozmert; Tugrul Tiryaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  [Patient radiation exposure during ureteroscopic stone extraction].

Authors:  G Zöller; P Virsik-Köpp; C Vowinkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Effects of dilatation types during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for less radiation exposure: a matched-pair pilot study.

Authors:  Bünyamin Yildirim; Mutlu Ates; Mustafa Karalar; Yigit Akin; Ibrahim Keles; Emre Tuzel
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 6.  Historical review of occupational exposures and cancer risks in medical radiation workers.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Ruth A Kleinerman; Steven L Simon; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Extracorporeal shock waves lithotripsy versus retrograde ureteroscopy: is radiation exposure a criterion when we choose which modern treatment to apply for ureteric stones?

Authors:  Catalin Pricop; Adrian Maier; Dragos Negru; Ovidiu Malau; Martha Orsolya; Daniel Radavoi; Dragomir R Serban
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.363

8.  Influence of surgeon's experience on fluoroscopy time during endourological interventions.

Authors:  M Ritter; F Siegel; P Krombach; A Martinschek; C Weiss; A Häcker; A E Pelzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Radiation exposure in prone vs. modified supine position during PCNL: Results with an anthropomorphic model.

Authors:  Marie-Pier St-Laurent; Steve Doizi; Maéva Rosec; Jean-Baptiste Terrasa; Luca Villa; Olivier Traxer; Jonathan Cloutier
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Ultrasound Guidance to Assist Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Reduces Radiation Exposure in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Manint Usawachintachit; Selma Masic; Helena C Chang; Isabel E Allen; Thomas Chi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.