Literature DB >> 16868681

Renal cell carcinoma: the influence of new diagnostic imaging techniques on the size and stage of tumors diagnosed over the past 26 years.

Stavros Touloupidis1, Athanasios Papathanasiou, Christos Kalaitzis, Georgios Fatles, Ioannis Manavis, Vassilios Rombis.   

Abstract

We have analyzed data collected over a 26-year period for influences of new diagnostic imaging techniques (ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) on the size, stage, and other parameters of renal cell carcinomas at the time of first diagnosis. We reviewed retrospectively the records of 203 patients who underwent operations at our institutions from 1973 to 1999. All the patients suffered from renal cell carcinoma. With this study we attempted to answer four questions regarding changes over this time span: (1) have new imaging techniques lead to a reduction in the median diameter of the tumor upon first diagnosis, (2) has the tumor stage decreased due to earlier diagnosis, (3) is there any correlation between tumor size and tumor stage, and (4) are the patient's early diagnoses at a younger age? Other parameters such as infiltration of the renal pelvis and the cell type were also examined. The tumor size and stage at the time of diagnosis and treatment are positively correlated, and both decrease significantly over the time span examined. There is also a strong association between tumor size and infiltration of the renal pelvis. The median age of the patients did not significantly change over time. The wider use of improved imaging techniques has significantly changed the clinical appearance of the renal cell carcinoma. The question is whether these techniques have also affected the prognosis of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16868681     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-005-4762-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  14 in total

1.  The impact of tumor size on clinical outcome in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  O Nativ; E Sabo; G Raviv; S Madjar; S Halachmi; B Moskovitz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Incidental detection of renal tumours by abdominal ultrasonography.

Authors:  G Vallancien; L O Torres; E Gurfinkel; B Veillon; J M Brisset
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma: pathological features, survival trends and implications for treatment.

Authors:  J P Sweeney; J A Thornhill; R Graiger; T E McDermott; M R Butler
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-09

4.  Renal cell carcinoma: incidental detection and pathological staging.

Authors:  W Y Siow; S K Yip; L G Ng; P H Tan; W S Cheng; K T Foo
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  2000-10

5.  Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma--is tumor size a suitable parameter for indication?

Authors:  J Miller; C Fischer; R Freese; M Altmannsberger; W Weidner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982-1997).

Authors:  L G Luciani; R Cestari; C Tallarigo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Renal cell carcinoma as an incidental finding.

Authors:  J W Konnak; H B Grossman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Nephron sparing surgery in incidental versus suspected renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M R Licht; A C Novick; M Goormastic
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Increased incidental detection and reduced mortality in renal cancer--recent retrospective analysis at eight institutions.

Authors:  Y Homma; K Kawabe; T Kitamura; Y Nishimura; M Shinohara; Y Kondo; I Saito; S Minowada; Y Asakage
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.369

10.  Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical symptoms related to renal cell carcinoma are independent prognostic factors for intraoperative complications and overall survival.

Authors:  Attila Szendroi; Adám Tabák; Peter Riesz; Miklós Szucs; Peter Nyírády; Attila Majoros; Gabriel Haas; Imre Romics
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Role of preoperative MR volumetry in patients with renal cell carcinoma for prediction of postoperative renal function after radical nephrectomy and nephron sparing surgery.

Authors:  Hira Lal; Paritosh Singh; Priyank Yadav; Anuradha Singh; Uday P Singh; Sanjoy K Sureka; Rakesh Kapoor
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Role of MRI in staging and surgical planning and its clinicopathological correlation in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hira Lal; Paritosh Singh; Manoj Jain; Uday Pratap Singh; Sanjoy Kumar Sureka; Rajanikant R Yadav; Raghunandan Prasad; Pragati Verma; Anuradha Singh; Priyank Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.