BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide normative data of bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm(2)) of the forearm and the calcaneus, evaluated by peripheral dual X ray absorbtiometry (DXA), in children aged 6 to 7 years of age and to evaluate the association with anthropometrics and sex. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 368 boys and 326 girls with a mean age of 6.7 +/- 0.4 years participated. BMD was measured by DXA in the forearms and the os calcanei, with average values presented in this report. Measurements of weight, height, skinfolds, the width of distal radius and ulna, and the femur condyles were collected and body composition estimated from skinfolds measurements. RESULTS: There was no difference in calcaneus BMD when comparing boys and girls, whereas the boys had 4.5% (0.013 g/cm(2)) higher forearm BMD than the girls (P < 0.001). Calcaneal BMD (mean 0.318 g/cm(2)) was 11% higher than forearm BMD (mean 0.283 g/cm(2)). Linear relationship was found between calcaneus BMD and weight (partial r = 0.50), Fat free mass (FFM) (partial r = 0.50), Fat mass (FM) (partial r = 0.45), % body fat (partial r = 0.29) and knee width (partial r = 0.46), all P < 0.000 respectively. Adjusted for weight the relationship between calcaneus BMD and FFM, FM, %body fat and knee width disappeared. There were significant relationships between the forearm BMD and weight (partial r = 0.37), FFM (partial r = 0.39), FM (partial r = 0.28), %body fat (partial r = 0.14) and wrist width (partial r = 0.24), all P < 0.000 respectively. Adjusted for body weight, the relationship remained between forearm BMD and FFM (r = 0.10), FM (R = -0.10) and % body fat (r = -0.12), all P < 0.000 respectively. Children measured in the spring had 3.5% (P < 0.01) higher calcaneus BMD than children measured in the winter. CONCLUSION: Seven year old boys have higher BMD in the forearm but not in the calcaneus in comparison with girls of a similar age. Body weight is the best predictor of calcaneus BMD, accounting for 25% of the variance whereas body weight and FFM are the best predictors of forearm BMD, each accounting for 17% of the variance, respectively.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide normative data of bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm(2)) of the forearm and the calcaneus, evaluated by peripheral dual X ray absorbtiometry (DXA), in children aged 6 to 7 years of age and to evaluate the association with anthropometrics and sex. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 368 boys and 326 girls with a mean age of 6.7 +/- 0.4 years participated. BMD was measured by DXA in the forearms and the os calcanei, with average values presented in this report. Measurements of weight, height, skinfolds, the width of distal radius and ulna, and the femur condyles were collected and body composition estimated from skinfolds measurements. RESULTS: There was no difference in calcaneus BMD when comparing boys and girls, whereas the boys had 4.5% (0.013 g/cm(2)) higher forearm BMD than the girls (P < 0.001). Calcaneal BMD (mean 0.318 g/cm(2)) was 11% higher than forearm BMD (mean 0.283 g/cm(2)). Linear relationship was found between calcaneus BMD and weight (partial r = 0.50), Fat free mass (FFM) (partial r = 0.50), Fat mass (FM) (partial r = 0.45), % body fat (partial r = 0.29) and knee width (partial r = 0.46), all P < 0.000 respectively. Adjusted for weight the relationship between calcaneus BMD and FFM, FM, %body fat and knee width disappeared. There were significant relationships between the forearm BMD and weight (partial r = 0.37), FFM (partial r = 0.39), FM (partial r = 0.28), %body fat (partial r = 0.14) and wrist width (partial r = 0.24), all P < 0.000 respectively. Adjusted for body weight, the relationship remained between forearm BMD and FFM (r = 0.10), FM (R = -0.10) and % body fat (r = -0.12), all P < 0.000 respectively. Children measured in the spring had 3.5% (P < 0.01) higher calcaneus BMD than children measured in the winter. CONCLUSION: Seven year old boys have higher BMD in the forearm but not in the calcaneus in comparison with girls of a similar age. Body weight is the best predictor of calcaneus BMD, accounting for 25% of the variance whereas body weight and FFM are the best predictors of forearm BMD, each accounting for 17% of the variance, respectively.
Authors: J Martínez-Mesa; M C Restrepo-Méndez; D A González; F C Wehrmeister; B L Horta; M R Domingues; A M B Menezes Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Hannes Hrafnkelsson; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Kristjan Th Magnusson; Emil L Sigurdsson; Erlingur Johannsson Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2013-02-09 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: Jeovany Martínez-Mesa; Ana Maria Baptista Menezes; Laura D Howe; Fernando Cesar Wehrmeister; Ludmila Correia Muniz; David Alejandro González-Chica; Maria Cecilia Assunção; Helen Gonçalves; Fernando C Barros Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: S Kriemler; L Zahner; J J Puder; C Braun-Fahrländer; C Schindler; N J Farpour-Lambert; M Kränzlin; R Rizzoli Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2008-04-19 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Ludmila Correa Muniz; Ana Maria Baptista Menezes; Maria Cecília Formoso Assunção; Jeovany Martínez-Mesa; Fernando Cesar Wehrmeister; Laura D Howe; Pedro Curi Hallal; Helen Gonçalves; Fernando C Barros Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2015-03-29 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Ludmila Correa Muniz; Ana Maria Baptista Menezes; Maria Cecília Formoso Assunção; Fernando Cesar Wehrmeister; Jeovany Martínez-Mesa; Helen Gonçalves; Marlos Rodrigues Domingues; Denise Petrucci Gigante; Bernardo Lessa Horta; Fernando C Barros Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Catharine R Gale; M Kassim Javaid; Sian M Robinson; Catherine M Law; Keith M Godfrey; Cyrus Cooper Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-08-07 Impact factor: 5.958