Literature DB >> 16867298

Comparing the results of five lifting analysis tools.

Steven J Russell1, Lori Winnemuller, Janice E Camp, Peter W Johnson.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the results of the NIOSH, ACGIH TLV, Snook, 3DSSPP and WA L&I lifting assessment instruments when applied to a uniform task (lifting and lowering milk cases with capacities of 15 and 23l). To enable comparisons between the various lifting assessment instruments, the outputs of each method were converted to an exposure index similar to the NIOSH Lifting Index. All instruments showed higher exposures associated with lifting the 23l cases versus the 15l cases. The NIOSH, ACGIH TLV and Snook methods were similar in their results with respect to the pattern of exposure over various height levels and the differences in exposures associated with lifting 15 and 23l cases. However, the WA L&I and 3DSSPP predicted substantially lower exposures. The reasons for instrument differences are presented so that practitioners can better select the methods they need and interpret the results appropriately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16867298     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  4 in total

1.  Impact of the seated height to stature ratio on torso segment parameters.

Authors:  Zachary Merrill; Charles Woolley; Rakié Cham
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Classification of body postures using smart workwear.

Authors:  Christian Lins; Andreas Hein
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Job Hazard Analyses for Musculoskeletal Disorder Risk Factors in Pressing Operations of Dry-cleaning Establishments.

Authors:  Jung-Keun Park
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2016-05-25

4.  Comparison of risk assessment procedures used in OCRA and ULRA methods.

Authors:  Danuta Roman-Liu; Anna Groborz; Tomasz Tokarski
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.778

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.