Literature DB >> 16867087

Propofol/remifentanil vs sevoflurane/remifentanil for long lasting surgical procedures: a randomised controlled trial.

J Höcker1, P H Tonner, P Böllert, A Paris, J Scholz, C Meier-Paika, B Bein.   

Abstract

We compared the haemodynamics, emergence and recovery characteristics of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol/remifentanil with sevoflurane/remifentanil anaesthesia, under bispectral index guidance, in 103 patients undergoing surgical procedures lasting > 3.5 h. Time to tracheal extubation was significantly shorter in the propofol group than in the sevoflurane group (mean (SD) 8.3 (3.5) min vs 10.8 (4.6) min, respectively; p = 0.0024), but further recovery was comparable in both groups. There were no significant differences in haemodynamic parameters, intensity of pain or postoperative nausea and vomiting. During and after anaesthesia of comparable depth for long lasting surgical procedures, both propofol/remifentanil and sevoflurane/remifentanil enable haemodynamic stability and fast emergence. The shorter time to extubation in the propofol group does not offer a relevant clinical advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16867087     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04715.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

1.  Incidence and risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients with fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and single antiemetic prophylaxis.

Authors:  Jong Bum Choi; Yon Hee Shim; Youn-Woo Lee; Jeong Soo Lee; Jong-Rim Choi; Chul Ho Chang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

2.  Sevoflurane/propofol coadministration provides better recovery than sevoflurane in combined general/epidural anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Chao Liang; Ming Ding; Fang Du; Jing Cang; Zhanggang Xue
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Comparative randomized study of propofol target-controlled infusion versus sevoflurane anesthesia for third molar extraction.

Authors:  Patrick K Chung; Parmanand Dhanrajani
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-06-29

4.  Comparison of recovery profiles of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia with bispectral index monitoring in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Zeynep Nur Orhon; Sibel Devrim; Melek Celik; Yekbun Dogan; Asif Yildirim; Erem Kaan Basok
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-03-19

5.  Comparative evaluation of cost effectiveness and recovery profile between propofol and sevoflurane in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yashpal Singh; Anil P Singh; Gaurav Jain; Ghanshyam Yadav; Dinesh Kumar Singh
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2015 May-Aug

6.  Patient quality of recovery on the day of surgery after propofol total intravenous anesthesia for vitrectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Se Hee Na; Kyu Hee Jeong; Dahae Eum; Jin Ha Park; Min-Soo Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.