Literature DB >> 16866746

Do humans and baboons use the same information when categorizing human and baboon faces?

Julie Martin-Malivel1, Michael C Mangini, Joël Fagot, Irving Biederman.   

Abstract

What information is used for sorting pictures of complex stimuli into categories? We applied a reverse correlation method to reveal the visual features mediating categorization in humans and baboons. Two baboons and 6 humans were trained to sort, by species, pictures of human and baboon faces on which random visual noise was superimposed. On ambiguous probe trials, a human-baboon morph was presented, eliciting "human" responses on some trials and "baboon" responses on others. The difference between the noise patterns that induced the two responses made explicit the information mediating the classification. Unlike the humans, the baboons based their categorization on information that closely matched that used by a theoretical observer responding solely on the basis of the pixel similarities between the probe and training images. We show that the classification-image technique and principal components analysis provide a method to make explicit the differences in the information mediating categorization in humans and animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16866746     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01751.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  9 in total

1.  Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visual discrimination of primate species based on faces in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Duncan A Wilson; Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Using the reassignment procedure to test object representation in pigeons and people.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Yasuo Nagasaka; Michael E Young; Edward A Wasserman; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  A comparative psychophysical approach to visual perception in primates.

Authors:  Toyomi Matsuno; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Memory and Perception-based Facial Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Chi-Hsun Chang; Dan Nemrodov; Andy C H Lee; Adrian Nestor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Neural Dynamics of Facial Identity Processing: Insights from EEG-Based Pattern Analysis and Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Dan Nemrodov; Matthias Niemeier; Ashutosh Patel; Adrian Nestor
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-02-26

7.  Commentary: The Code for Facial Identity in the Primate Brain.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Comparison of Scalp ERP to Faces in Macaques and Humans.

Authors:  John Orczyk; Charles E Schroeder; Ilana Y Abeles; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Pamela D Butler; Yoshinao Kajikawa
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-16

9.  The face inversion effect in non-human primates revisited - an investigation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Christoph D Dahl; Malte J Rasch; Masaki Tomonaga; Ikuma Adachi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.