Literature DB >> 16865680

Chemoprevention: drug pricing and mortality: the case of tamoxifen.

Joy Melnikow1, Christina Kuenneth, L Jay Helms, Amber Barnato, Miriam Kuppermann, Stephen Birch, James Nuovo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen is a prototypic cancer chemopreventive agent, yet clinical trials have not evaluated its effect on mortality or the impact of drug pricing on its cost-effectiveness.
METHODS: A state-transition Markov model for a hypothetical cohort of women age 50 years was used to evaluate the effects of tamoxifen on mortality and tamoxifen price on cost-effectiveness. Incidence and mortality rates for breast and endometrial cancers were derived from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results statistics, and noncancer outcomes were obtained from published studies. Relative risks of outcomes were derived from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 trial. Costs were based on Medicare reimbursements.
RESULTS: Projected overall mortality for women at 1.67% 5-year breast cancer risk showed little difference with or without tamoxifen, resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,335,690 per life-year saved as a result of tamoxifen use. Adjusting for the differential impact of estrogen receptor-negative cancers, tamoxifen increased mortality for women with a uterus until the 5-year breast cancer risk reached > or =2.1%. Assigning the Canadian price for tamoxifen dramatically reduced the incremental cost (to $123,780 per life-year saved). At that price, the use of tamoxifen was less costly and more effective for women with 5-year breast cancer risks >4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Tamoxifen may increase mortality in women at the lower end of the "high-risk" range for breast cancer. If prices in the U.S. approximated Canadian prices, then tamoxifen use for breast cancer risk reduction in women with a 5-year risk >3% could be a reasonable strategy to reduce the incidence of breast cancer. Because they are used by many unaffected individuals, the price of chemopreventive agents has a major influence on their cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16865680     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  3 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a low-fat diet in the prevention of breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Antônio M Bós; Barbara V Howard; Shirley A A Beresford; Nicole Urban; Lesley F Tinker; Hugh Waters; Angelo J Bós; Rowan Chlebowski; Jacqueline M Ennis
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-01

2.  Economic evaluation of chemoprevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen and raloxifene among high-risk women in Japan.

Authors:  M Kondo; S-L Hoshi; M Toi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  The Steroid Metabolome and Breast Cancer Risk in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: The Novel Role of Adrenal Androgens and Glucocorticoids.

Authors:  Lauren C Houghton; Renata E Howland; Ying Wei; Xinran Ma; Rebecca D Kehm; Wendy K Chung; Jeanine M Genkinger; Regina M Santella; Michaela F Hartmann; Stefan A Wudy; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.090

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.