BACKGROUND: Humoral alloresponses may contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in a subset of kidney transplant recipients. For chronic humoral rejection, the efficacy of rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil has been suggested. METHODS: Eleven recipients with C4d-positive CAN (index biopsy performed after a median of 3 years posttransplantation), who had been on cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression, were converted to tacrolimus, and if not part of basal therapy, to mycophenolate mofetil. We evaluated the effect of this tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy on clinical outcomes and on alloantibody formation detected with flow cytometric testing of panel-reactive antibody. RESULTS: Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy (plus anti-rejection treatment in six recipients with additional signs of acute cellular rejection) failed to prevent progressive deterioration of graft function. Four patients returned to dialysis after 4 to 18 months. Serial post-transplant serology detected HLA class I and/or II reactivity in seven recipients. Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil therapy did not affect the time course of alloantibody levels. One patient with C4d-positive transplant glomerulopathy, who did not respond to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy, developed nephrotic-range proteinuria associated with a rapid decline of allograft function. Despite considerable reduction in alloantibody levels and nearly complete clearance of C4d deposits, immunoadsorption failed to prevent graft failure in this patient. CONCLUSION: Our data argue against the efficacy of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy in established C4d-positive chronic allograft dysfunction. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate whether early initiation of this or other antihumoral strategies are capable of effectively preventing alloantibody-mediated chronic graft injury.
BACKGROUND: Humoral alloresponses may contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in a subset of kidney transplant recipients. For chronic humoral rejection, the efficacy of rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil has been suggested. METHODS: Eleven recipients with C4d-positive CAN (index biopsy performed after a median of 3 years posttransplantation), who had been on cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression, were converted to tacrolimus, and if not part of basal therapy, to mycophenolate mofetil. We evaluated the effect of this tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy on clinical outcomes and on alloantibody formation detected with flow cytometric testing of panel-reactive antibody. RESULTS:Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy (plus anti-rejection treatment in six recipients with additional signs of acute cellular rejection) failed to prevent progressive deterioration of graft function. Four patients returned to dialysis after 4 to 18 months. Serial post-transplant serology detected HLA class I and/or II reactivity in seven recipients. Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil therapy did not affect the time course of alloantibody levels. One patient with C4d-positive transplant glomerulopathy, who did not respond to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy, developed nephrotic-range proteinuria associated with a rapid decline of allograft function. Despite considerable reduction in alloantibody levels and nearly complete clearance of C4d deposits, immunoadsorption failed to prevent graft failure in this patient. CONCLUSION: Our data argue against the efficacy of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy in established C4d-positive chronic allograft dysfunction. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate whether early initiation of this or other antihumoral strategies are capable of effectively preventing alloantibody-mediated chronic graft injury.
Authors: Manuel Pascual; Tom Theruvath; Tatsuo Kawai; Nina Tolkoff-Rubin; A Benedict Cosimi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Regele; M Exner; B Watschinger; C Wenter; M Wahrmann; C Osterreicher; M D Säemann; N Mersich; W H Hörl; G J Zlabinger; G A Böhmig Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: T P Theruvath; S L Saidman; S Mauiyyedi; F L Delmonico; W W Williams; N Tolkoff-Rubin; A B Collins; R B Colvin; A B Cosimi; M Pascual Journal: Transplantation Date: 2001-07-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: A Piazza; E Poggi; L Borrelli; S Servetti; P I Monaco; O Buonomo; M Valeri; N Torlone; D Adorno; C U Casciani Journal: Transplantation Date: 2001-04-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Matthias Lorenz; Heinz Regele; Martin Schillinger; Markus Exner; Susanne Rasoul-Rockenschaub; Markus Wahrmann; Josef Kletzmayr; Gerd Silberhumer; Walter H Hörl; Georg A Böhmig Journal: Transplantation Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Lorraine C Racusen; Robert B Colvin; Kim Solez; Michael J Mihatsch; Philip F Halloran; Patricia M Campbell; Michael J Cecka; Jean-Pierre Cosyns; Anthony J Demetris; Michael C Fishbein; Agnes Fogo; Peter Furness; Ian W Gibson; Denis Glotz; Pekka Hayry; Lawrence Hunsickern; Michael Kashgarian; Ronald Kerman; Alex J Magil; Robert Montgomery; Kunio Morozumi; Volker Nickeleit; Parmjeet Randhawa; Heinz Regele; Daniel Seron; Surya Seshan; Stale Sund; Kiril Trpkov Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Judith E Worthington; Susan Martin; Dalia M Al-Husseini; Philip A Dyer; Robert W G Johnson Journal: Transplantation Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Michael Haidinger; Sabine Schmaldienst; Günther Körmöczi; Heinz Regele; Afschin Soleiman; Dieter Schwartz; Kurt Derfler; Rudolf Steininger; Ferdinand Mühlbacher; Georg A Böhmig Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2009 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Željko Kikić; Alexander Kainz; Nicolas Kozakowski; Rainer Oberbauer; Heinz Regele; Gregor Bond; Georg A Böhmig Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 8.237