Literature DB >> 16865084

The effects of hydroxyethyl starch solution in critically ill patients.

D Palumbo1, G Servillo, L D'Amato, M L Volpe, G Capogrosso, E De Robertis, O Piazza, R Tufano.   

Abstract

AIM: In the treatment of the critically ill patients an adequate fluid therapy appears to be essential to optimize hemodynamics and to get a suitable tissue perfusion. In this study we have evaluated the effects of volume replacement, carried out with 2 different solutions: hydroxyethyl starch 6% (HAES) and albumin 20% (HA).
METHODS: Twenty patients suffering from sepsis were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. The first group was treated with hydroxyethyl starch 6% ( HAES treated group), and the second with albumin 20% (HA treated group). The volume of colloids was given to maintain pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) between 15 and 18 mmHg. Daily, both hemodynamic parameters and blood gas analyses were monitored.
RESULTS: Groups were homogeneous for age, sex and pathology. During the treatment we observed that cardiac index (CI), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), oxygen consumption index (VO(2)I), oxygen delivery index (DO(2)I), and rate between arterial oxygen pressure and fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) were increased significantly only in HAES treated group (P<0.05). APACHE II score decreased significantly only in HAES treated group (P<0.05), contrarily to the HA treated group, in which we observed a non significant increase.
CONCLUSIONS: Since hydroxyethyl starch induced a hemodynamic and clinical improvement, these effects translated into an improvement of sensorium and a reduction of APACHE II score, without causing pulmonary edema, we can conclude that hydroxyethyl starch 6% ws 130,000 dalton ms 0.4 (Voluven) is an effective fluid for resuscitation of hypovolemic patients and represent an attractive alternative to albumin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16865084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  17 in total

Review 1.  Randomised trials of 6% tetrastarch (hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or 0.42) for severe sepsis reporting mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Umeer Waheed; Stephen J Brett
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Sepsis in pregnancy and early goal-directed therapy.

Authors:  Julie Joseph; Aneeta Sinha; Michael Paech; Barry N J Walters
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 3.  Fluid replacement with hydroxyethyl starch in critical care--a reassessment.

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; Tobias Welte; Peter Schlattmann; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation.

Authors:  Frances Bunn; Daksha Trivedi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-11

Review 5.  Colloid solutions: a clinical update.

Authors:  Tomi T Niemi; Ryo Miyashita; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Renal outcomes and mortality following hydroxyethyl starch resuscitation of critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials: ATTENTION: The analysis and conclusions of this article are being revised by the authors. This is due to the journal Anesthesia and Analgesia's retraction of a paper by Dr. Joachim Boldt, an author in seven of the studies analyzed in this review. As such, the editors of Open Medicine recommend interpreting this review with extreme caution until Zarychanski et al. publish a new analysis and interpretation in Open Medicine. For more information, see Anesthesia and Analgesia's press release.

Authors:  Ryan Zarychanski; Alexis F Turgeon; Dean A Fergusson; Deborah J Cook; Paul Hébert; Sean M Bagshaw; Danny Monsour; Lauralyn McIntyre
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2009-10-27

Review 7.  CONTRA: Hydroxyethyl starch solutions are unsafe in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Christiane Hartog; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Fluid resuscitation with 6 % hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4 and 130/0.42) in acutely ill patients: systematic review of effects on mortality and treatment with renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  David J Gattas; Arina Dan; John Myburgh; Laurent Billot; Serigne Lo; Simon Finfer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Nicolai Haase; Anders Perner; Louise Inkeri Hennings; Martin Siegemund; Bo Lauridsen; Mik Wetterslev; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-15

10.  Comparing the effect of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 with balanced crystalloid solution on mortality and kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis (6S--Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock trial): study protocol, design and rationale for a double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Nicolai Haase; Jørn Wetterslev; Anders Aneman; Jyrki Tenhunen; Anne Berit Guttormsen; Gudmundur Klemenzson; Frank Pott; Karen Doris Bødker; Per Martin Bådstøløkken; Asger Bendtsen; Peter Søe-Jensen; Hamid Tousi; Morten Bestle; Malgorzata Pawlowicz; Robert Winding; Hans-Henrik Bülow; Claude Kancir; Morten Steensen; Jonas Nielsen; Bjarne Fogh; Kristian R Madsen; Nils H Larsen; Marcela Carlsson; Jørgen Wiis; John Asger Petersen; Susanne Iversen; Ole Schøidt; Siv Leivdal; Pawel Berezowicz; Ville Pettilä; Esko Ruokonen; Pål Klepstad; Sari Karlsson; Maija Kaukonen; Juha Rutanen; Sigurbergur Karason; Anne Lene Kjældgaard; Lars Broksø Holst; Jan Wernerman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.