BACKGROUND: In non-thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, endothelin (ET)-1 levels are increased and correlate with the hemodynamic severity of the disease. Whether such correlations exist in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is unknown, nor whether ET-1 levels correlate with hemodynamic outcome after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). METHODS AND RESULTS: ET-1 levels were determined by ELISA. ET-levels were increased in 35 CTEPH patients (1.62+/-0.21 pg/ml) compared with healthy controls (n=11: 0.75+/-0.06 pg/ml, p<0.02). ET-1 levels correlated (all p<0.0001) with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (r=0.70), cardiac index (r=-0.76), total pulmonary resistance (r=0.72), mixed venous oxygen saturation (r=-0.87), and the distance walked in the 6-min walk test (r=-0.59; p<0.005; n=23). Three months after PEA, ET-1 levels had decreased (p<0.002), and were similar between patients with and without residual pulmonary hypertension (p=0.4). Preoperative ET-1 levels, however, were higher in patients with bad postoperative outcome; that is, patients who either died because of persistent pulmonary hypertension or had residual pulmonary hypertension after PEA (2.68+/-0.48 pg/ml, and 1.13+/-0.15 pg/ml, respectively; p<0.002). The levels also correlated with hemodynamic outcome after PEA (mPAP: r=0.67, p<0.0001). By receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis, ET-1>1.77 pg/ml detected a bad postoperative outcome with a sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 85%, respectively, and a likelihood ratio of 5.2. CONCLUSION: ET-1 levels in CTEPH closely correlated with the hemodynamic and clinical severity of disease in a large cohort of patients. Preoperative ET-1 levels may be useful for better identification of patients at risk for persistent pulmonary hypertension after PEA.
BACKGROUND: In non-thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, endothelin (ET)-1 levels are increased and correlate with the hemodynamic severity of the disease. Whether such correlations exist in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is unknown, nor whether ET-1 levels correlate with hemodynamic outcome after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). METHODS AND RESULTS: ET-1 levels were determined by ELISA. ET-levels were increased in 35 CTEPHpatients (1.62+/-0.21 pg/ml) compared with healthy controls (n=11: 0.75+/-0.06 pg/ml, p<0.02). ET-1 levels correlated (all p<0.0001) with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (r=0.70), cardiac index (r=-0.76), total pulmonary resistance (r=0.72), mixed venous oxygen saturation (r=-0.87), and the distance walked in the 6-min walk test (r=-0.59; p<0.005; n=23). Three months after PEA, ET-1 levels had decreased (p<0.002), and were similar between patients with and without residual pulmonary hypertension (p=0.4). Preoperative ET-1 levels, however, were higher in patients with bad postoperative outcome; that is, patients who either died because of persistent pulmonary hypertension or had residual pulmonary hypertension after PEA (2.68+/-0.48 pg/ml, and 1.13+/-0.15 pg/ml, respectively; p<0.002). The levels also correlated with hemodynamic outcome after PEA (mPAP: r=0.67, p<0.0001). By receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis, ET-1>1.77 pg/ml detected a bad postoperative outcome with a sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 85%, respectively, and a likelihood ratio of 5.2. CONCLUSION: ET-1 levels in CTEPH closely correlated with the hemodynamic and clinical severity of disease in a large cohort of patients. Preoperative ET-1 levels may be useful for better identification of patients at risk for persistent pulmonary hypertension after PEA.
Authors: Roberta L Keller; Theresa A Tacy; Karen Hendricks-Munoz; Jie Xu; Anita J Moon-Grady; John Neuhaus; Phillip Moore; Kerilyn K Nobuhara; Sam Hawgood; Jeffrey R Fineman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-04-22 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sulaiman Surie; Herre J Reesink; J Tim Marcus; Mart N van der Plas; Jaap J Kloek; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf; Paul Bresser Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Lijuan Guo; Yuanhua Yang; Jie Liu; Lei Wang; Jifeng Li; Ying Wang; Yan Liu; Song Gu; Huili Gan; Jun Cai; Jason X-J Yuan; Jun Wang; Chen Wang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240