Literature DB >> 16864860

Pregnancy rate and first-service conception rate in Angus heifers.

J Minick Bormann1, L R Totir, S D Kachman, R L Fernando, D E Wilson.   

Abstract

The objective of this project was to determine the genetic control of conception rate, or pregnancy percentage in Angus beef heifers. Producers from 6 herds in 5 states provided 3,144 heifer records that included breeding dates, breeding contemporary groups, service sires, and pregnancy check information. Two hundred fourteen sires of the heifers were represented; with 104 sires having less than 5 progeny, and 14 sires having greater than 50 progeny. These data were combined with performance and pedigree information, including actual and adjusted birth weights, weaning weights, and yearling weights, from the American Angus Association database. Heifer pregnancy rate varied from 75 to 95% between herds, and from 65 to 100% between sires, with an overall pregnancy rate of 93%, measured as the percentage of heifers pregnant at pregnancy check after the breeding season. Pregnancy was analyzed as a threshold trait with an underlying continuous distribution. A generalized linear animal model, using a relationship matrix, was fitted. This model included the fixed effects of contemporary group, age of dam, and first AI service sire, and the covariates of heifer age at the beginning of breeding, adjusted birth weight, adjusted weaning weight, and adjusted yearling weight. The relationship matrix included 4 generations of pedigree. The heritability of pregnancy and first-service conception rates on the underlying scale was 0.13 +/- 0.07 and 0.03 +/- 0.03, respectively. Estimated breeding values for pregnancy rate on the observed scale ranged from -0.02 to 0.05 for sires of heifers. Including growth traits with pregnancy rate as 2-trait analyses did not change the heritability of pregnancy rate. As expected for a reproductive trait, the heritability of pregnancy rate was low. Because of its low heritability, genetic improvement in fertility by selection on heifer pregnancy rate would be expected to be slow.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16864860     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  Effect of feed intake restriction on reproductive performance and pregnancy rate in Egyptian buffalo heifers.

Authors:  Hassan Ali Hussein; Sherief Mohamed Abdel-Raheem
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Effect of culture medium volume and embryo density on early mouse embryonic development: tracking the development of the individual embryo.

Authors:  Shan-Jun Dai; Chang-Long Xu; Jeffrey Wang; Ying-Pu Sun; Ri-Cheng Chian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Relation of the maximum temperature and relative humidity close to the insemination with the tropical milking criollo heifer's gestation in three seasons.

Authors:  Froylan Rosales-Martínez; Adalberto Rosendo-Ponce; César Cortez-Romero; Jaime Gallegos-Sánchez; Juan M Cuca-García; Carlos M Becerril-Pérez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Genomic prediction of continuous and binary fertility traits of females in a composite beef cattle breed.

Authors:  S Toghiani; E Hay; P Sumreddee; T W Geary; R Rekaya; A J Roberts
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Uterine influences on conceptus development in fertility-classified animals.

Authors:  Joao G N Moraes; Susanta K Behura; Thomas W Geary; Peter J Hansen; Holly L Neibergs; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genetic correlations among weight and cumulative productivity of crossbred beef cows.

Authors:  Warren M Snelling; Larry A Kuehn; R Mark Thallman; Gary L Bennett; Bruce L Golden
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Transcriptome profiles in peripheral white blood cells at the time of artificial insemination discriminate beef heifers with different fertility potential.

Authors:  Sarah E Dickinson; Brock A Griffin; Michelle F Elmore; Lisa Kriese-Anderson; Joshua B Elmore; Paul W Dyce; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Evaluation of age, weaning weight, body condition score, and reproductive tract score in pre-selected beef heifers relative to reproductive potential.

Authors:  Sarah E Dickinson; Michelle F Elmore; Lisa Kriese-Anderson; Joshua B Elmore; Bailey N Walker; Paul W Dyce; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-26

9.  Assessment of expected breeding values for fertility traits of Murrah buffaloes under subtropical climate.

Authors:  Soumya Dash; A K Chakravarty; Avtar Singh; Pushp Raj Shivahre; Arpan Upadhyay; Vaishali Sah; K Mahesh Singh
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-03-12

10.  Plasma metabolomic profiles differ at the time of artificial insemination based on pregnancy outcome, in Bos taurus beef heifers.

Authors:  Kaitlyn M Phillips; Casey C Read; Lisa A Kriese-Anderson; Soren P Rodning; Terry D Brandebourg; Fernando H Biase; M Landon Marks; Joshua B Elmore; M Kent Stanford; Paul W Dyce
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.