PURPOSE: To compare the inhibition of neointimal proliferation by using non-stent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments were conducted with permission of the animal protection committee of the local government. Paclitaxel was either dissolved in a nonionic contrast medium or coated on balloons. Stents were crimped on the coated balloons. Effectiveness was tested in 22 pigs. Two coronary stents were placed in each pig, and slight overstretch was applied. The animals were treated as follows: group A (control group), uncoated balloons, bare stents, and "plain" contrast medium; group B, same treatment as group A, but with paclitaxel in the contrast medium; group C, paclitaxel-coated balloons, with premounted bare stents and plain contrast medium; and group D, sirolimus-eluting stents, noncoated balloons, and plain contrast medium. Stenosis was assessed 4 weeks later at angiography and histomorphometry. For exploratory purposes, continuous variables of quantitative coronary angiography and histomorphometry were compared by using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Results at follow-up angiography indicated a mean of 1.00 mm +/- 0.18 (standard deviation) lumen diameter loss in the control group and 0.14 mm +/- 0.18 loss in the group treated with the paclitaxel-coated balloon (group C; P < .001). Findings at histomorphometry confirmed the effectiveness of drug delivery, with the most impressive inhibition of neointimal proliferation from coated balloons-the neointimal area was 2.4 mm2 +/- 0.3 (P < .01 vs all other groups), compared with 5.2 mm2 +/- 0.3 in group A (control group), 4.3 mm2 +/- 0.3 in group B, and 3.8 mm2 +/- 0.3 in group D. CONCLUSION: In spite of the short intima contact time, paclitaxel coated on the balloon inhibits neointimal formation in the porcine model of coronary stent placement. RSNA, 2006
PURPOSE: To compare the inhibition of neointimal proliferation by using non-stent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments were conducted with permission of the animal protection committee of the local government. Paclitaxel was either dissolved in a nonionic contrast medium or coated on balloons. Stents were crimped on the coated balloons. Effectiveness was tested in 22 pigs. Two coronary stents were placed in each pig, and slight overstretch was applied. The animals were treated as follows: group A (control group), uncoated balloons, bare stents, and "plain" contrast medium; group B, same treatment as group A, but with paclitaxel in the contrast medium; group C, paclitaxel-coated balloons, with premounted bare stents and plain contrast medium; and group D, sirolimus-eluting stents, noncoated balloons, and plain contrast medium. Stenosis was assessed 4 weeks later at angiography and histomorphometry. For exploratory purposes, continuous variables of quantitative coronary angiography and histomorphometry were compared by using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Results at follow-up angiography indicated a mean of 1.00 mm +/- 0.18 (standard deviation) lumen diameter loss in the control group and 0.14 mm +/- 0.18 loss in the group treated with the paclitaxel-coated balloon (group C; P < .001). Findings at histomorphometry confirmed the effectiveness of drug delivery, with the most impressive inhibition of neointimal proliferation from coated balloons-the neointimal area was 2.4 mm2 +/- 0.3 (P < .01 vs all other groups), compared with 5.2 mm2 +/- 0.3 in group A (control group), 4.3 mm2 +/- 0.3 in group B, and 3.8 mm2 +/- 0.3 in group D. CONCLUSION: In spite of the short intima contact time, paclitaxel coated on the balloon inhibits neointimal formation in the porcine model of coronary stent placement. RSNA, 2006
Authors: Martin Unverdorben; Franz X Kleber; Hubertus Heuer; Hans-Reiner Figulla; Christian Vallbracht; Matthias Leschke; Bodo Cremers; Stefan Hardt; Michael Buerke; Hanns Ackermann; Michael Boxberger; Ralf Degenhardt; Bruno Scheller Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Joseph P Kilroy; Ali H Dhanaliwala; Alexander L Klibanov; Douglas K Bowles; Brian R Wamhoff; John A Hossack Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Bodo Cremers; John L Toner; Lewis B Schwartz; Randolf von Oepen; Ulrich Speck; Nicola Kaufels; Yvonne P Clever; Dirk Mahnkopf; Michael Böhm; Bruno Scheller Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Sean M O'Neill; Dina K Olympia; Todd E Fox; J Tony Brown; Thomas C Stover; Kristy L Houck; Ronald Wilson; Peter Waybill; Mark Kozak; Steven W Levison; Norbert Weber; Linda M Karavodin; Mark Kester Journal: Vasc Dis Prev Date: 2008-08-01
Authors: Bruno Scheller; Christoph Hehrlein; Wolfgang Bocksch; Wolfgang Rutsch; Dariush Haghi; Ulrich Dietz; Michael Böhm; Ulrich Speck Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 5.460