Literature DB >> 16863927

Salvage treatment for childhood ependymoma after surgery only: Pitfalls of omitting "at once" adjuvant treatment.

Maura Massimino1, Felice Giangaspero, Maria Luisa Garrè, Lorenzo Genitori, Giorgio Perilongo, Paola Collini, Daria Riva, Laura Valentini, Giovanni Scarzello, Geraldina Poggi, Filippo Spreafico, Paola Peretta, Maurizio Mascarin, Piergiorgio Modena, Gabriella Sozzi, Nice Bedini, Veronica Biassoni, Alessandro Urgesi, Maria Rosa Balestrini, Gaetano Finocchiaro, Alessandro Sandri, Lorenza Gandola.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To discuss the results obtained by giving adjuvant treatment for childhood ependymoma (EPD) at relapse after complete surgery only. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1993 and 2002, 63 children older than 3 years old entered the first Italian Association for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology protocol for EPD (group A), and another 14 patients were referred after relapsing after more tumor excisions only (group B). Prognostic factors were homogeneously matched in the two groups. We report on the outcome of group B.
RESULTS: Mean time to first local progression in group B had been 14 months. Tumors originated in the posterior fossa (PF) in 10 children and were supratentorial (ST) in 4; 11 had first been completely excised (NED) and 3 had residual disease (ED). Diagnoses were classic EPD in 9 patients, anaplastic in 5. Eight children were referred NED and 6 ED after two or more operations, 5 had cranial nerve palsy, 1 had recurrent meningitis, and 2 had persistent hydrocephalus. All received radiotherapy (RT) to tumor bed and 5 also had pre-RT chemotherapy. Six of 14 patients (6/10 with PF tumors) had a further relapse a mean 6 months after the last surgery; 4 of 6 died: progression-free survival and overall survival at 4 years after referral were 54.4% and 77%, respectively. Considering only PF tumors and setting time 0 as at the last surgery for group B, progression-free survival and overall survival were 32% and 50% for group B and 52% (p < 0.20)/70% (p < 0.29) for the 46 patients in group A with PF tumors. Local control was 32% in group B and 70.5% in group A (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Relapsers after surgery only, especially if with PF-EPD, do worse than those treated after first diagnosis; subsequent surgery for tumor relapse has severe neurologic sequelae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16863927     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Do we really need class 1 evidence results to give adjuvant radiation therapy to childhood intracranial ependymomas?

Authors:  Maura Massimino; Lorenza Gandola; Maria Luisa Garrè; Armando Cama; Piergiorgio Modena; Paolo Potepan; Felice Giangaspero
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Gonadotropin-dependent precocious puberty: neoplastic causes and endocrine considerations.

Authors:  Matthew D Stephen; Peter E Zage; Steven G Waguespack
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2011-03-06

3.  Management of childhood brain tumors: consensus report by the Pediatric Hematology Oncology (PHO) Chapter of Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP).

Authors:  Sunil Bhat; Satya Prakash Yadav; Vaishali Suri; Rana Patir; Purna Kurkure; Stewart Kellie; Anupam Sachdeva
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 4.  Proton therapy for paediatric CNS tumours - improving treatment-related outcomes.

Authors:  Vinai Gondi; Torunn I Yock; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Predictors of outcome in an AIEOP series of childhood ependymomas: a multifactorial analysis.

Authors:  Piergiorgio Modena; Francesca R Buttarelli; Rosalba Miceli; Elena Piccinin; Caterina Baldi; Manila Antonelli; Isabella Morra; Libero Lauriola; Concezio Di Rocco; Maria Luisa Garrè; Iacopo Sardi; Lorenzo Genitori; Roberta Maestro; Lorenza Gandola; Federica Facchinetti; Paola Collini; Gabriella Sozzi; Felice Giangaspero; Maura Massimino
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Survival following treatment for intracranial ependymoma: a review.

Authors:  G Tamburrini; M D'Ercole; B L Pettorini; M Caldarelli; L Massimi; C Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Management strategies for recurrent ependymoma in the paediatric population.

Authors:  M Sangra; N Thorp; P May; B Pizer; C Mallucci
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 8.  The management of completely resected childhood intracranial ependymoma: the argument for observation only.

Authors:  Andrew S Little; Tyson Sheean; Ragavan Manoharan; Aneela Darbar; Charles Teo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Current treatment options for pediatric and adult patients with ependymoma.

Authors:  Karen D Wright; Amar Gajjar
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.