Literature DB >> 16863895

Family support, living alone, and subjective health of a patient in connection with a coronary artery bypass surgery.

Eila Okkonen1, Hannu Vanhanen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study's objective was to evaluate the connections among family support, living alone, and subjective health after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS).
DESIGN: This was a prospective and comparative follow-up study.
SETTING: The study took place in surgical clinics in two university hospitals in Finland. PATIENTS: A total of 279 patients underwent CABS. The sample comprised consecutive patients who were willing to participate. INTERVENTION: The patients were asked to evaluate their subjective health before surgery (initial phase) and 6 months after surgery (follow-up phase). OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome was measured by the Chest Pain and Dyspnea Scale, Modified Beck Depression Inventory, Endler Anxiety Scale, Family Support Scale, and Hopelessness items.
RESULTS: Subjective health improved significantly after CABS. Those who had lower family support before surgery had more depressive symptoms, anxiety, and hopelessness than those who had more support. In the group with low family support, the subjective health of women was poorer than that of men, and those who had no vocational education described poorer health than others. In the group with high family support, those who had no vocational education had more chest pain and dyspnea than others. Patients who were living alone had initially more depressive symptoms and hopelessness compared with patients living with someone. At follow-up, those living alone reported more chest pain and depressive symptoms than those living with someone. Patients aged less than 65 years and living alone reported more depressive symptoms, anxiety, and hopelessness than the oldest age group during the follow-up. In those patients living with someone, the subjective health of female patients, patients aged less than 65 years, and patients who had no vocational education was poorer than others.
CONCLUSIONS: High family support seemed to protect health and promote recovery. In nursing it is important to take care of those who receive only limited amount of family support or who live alone. These results suggest that women, patients aged less than 65 years, and patients with no vocational education may need additional support and care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16863895     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  9 in total

1.  Clinical Implications of Psychosocial Factors on Pediatric External Fixation Treatment and Recommendations.

Authors:  Heather M Richard; Dylan C Nguyen; John G Birch; Sandy D Roland; Mikhail K Samchukov; Alex M Cherkashin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The 13 item Family Support Scale: Reliability and validity of the Greek translation in a sample of Greek health care professionals.

Authors:  Athanasios Tselebis; Tania Anagnostopoulou; Dionisios Bratis; Aikaterini Moulou; Alexia Maria; Christos Sikaras; Ioannis Ilias; Athanasios Karkanias; Georgios Moussas; Nikolaos Tzanakis
Journal:  Asia Pac Fam Med       Date:  2011-04-13

3.  Quality of life in cancer patients: The role of optimism, hopelessness, and partner support.

Authors:  Mila Gustavsson-Lilius; Juhani Julkunen; Päivi Hietanen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Social Factors, Sex, and Mortality Risk After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Susanne Nielsen; Kok Wai Giang; Andreas Wallinder; Annika Rosengren; Aldina Pivodic; Anders Jeppsson; Martin Karlsson
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Attachment insecurities, caregiver burden, and psychological distress among partners of patients with heart disease.

Authors:  Simone Zofia Laflamme; Karen Bouchard; Karolina Sztajerowska; Kathleen Lalande; Paul S Greenman; Heather Tulloch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  The effect of recommended Azkar on anxiety, stress, and depression in families of patients undergoing open heart surgery.

Authors:  Roghayeh Mehdipour-Rabori; Monirosadat Nematollahi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-05

7.  How Important Are Social Support, Expectations and Coping Patterns during Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Maria J C Blikman; Hege R Jacobsen; Geir Egil Eide; Eivind Meland
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2014-09-15

8.  Family SES, family social capital, and general health in Chinese adults: exploring their relationships and the gender-based differences.

Authors:  Ying Ji; Qingping Yun; Xuewen Jiang; Chun Chang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Psychosocial Determinants of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Two Years After Surgery.

Authors:  Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Aparna Ingleshwar; Glenn C Landon; Sherwin J Siff; Andrea Barbo; Heather Y Lin; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  ACR Open Rheumatol       Date:  2020-09-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.