Literature DB >> 16863233

Measurement of air-water interfacial area for multiple hysteretic drainage curves in an unsaturated fine sand.

Lixia Chen1, Tohren C G Kibbey.   

Abstract

A new method has been developed to measure fluid-fluid interfacial area during multiple drainages, along with the measurement of hysteretic capillary pressure-saturation (P(c)-S) relationships in unsaturated porous media. The method makes use of an automated device which has been successfully used for rapid measurement of hysteretic P(c)-S relationships, in combination with a novel technique for interfacial area measurement. A pure anionic surfactant, sodium octylbenzene sulfonate (SOBS), is used as a surface-active tracer, and a flow-through UV spectrometer is used to monitor the real-time concentration change of SOBS solution due to adsorption to the fluid-fluid interface during drainage. The Gibbs and Langmuir adsorption equations are applied in combination with a continuous mole balance to calculate interfacial areas. Using this method, air-water interfacial area of a fine sand was measured as a function of capillary pressure and saturation during primary, secondary, and one scanning drainages to explore the influence of drying/wetting history on interfacial area. Results show that 8-20 and 12-22 cm(2)/g more air-water interface was generated in secondary and scanning drainages, respectively, than in primary drainage, with the magnitude of the difference varying as a function of saturation. An advantage of the method is that interfacial tension variations from the method itself are relatively small, typically on the order of 5 mN/m, so measured areas are not skewed by surface-tension-induced changes in interfacial area. In a measurement specifically designed to study the influence of surfactant-induced interfacial tension variations, approximately two times more interfacial area was observed for a 25 mN/m interfacial tension change, in comparison with a system with relatively constant interfacial tension. Implications of results of interfacial area measurements for hysteresis in the three-dimensional relationship between capillary pressure, saturation, and interfacial area are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 16863233     DOI: 10.1021/la053521e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  6 in total

1.  The two-phase flow IPTT method for measurement of nonwetting-wetting liquid interfacial areas at higher nonwetting saturations in natural porous media.

Authors:  Hua Zhong; Asma El Ouni; Dan Lin; Bingguo Wang; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 5.240

2.  Aggregate-based sub-CMC Solubilization of Hexadecane by Surfactants.

Authors:  Hua Zhong; Lei Yang; Guangming Zeng; Mark L Brusseau; Yake Wang; Yang Li; Zhifeng Liu; Xingzhong Yuan; Fei Tan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.361

3.  Novel methods for measuring air-water interfacial area in unsaturated porous media.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Asma El Ouni; Juliana B Araujo; Hua Zhong
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Comparison of Fluid-Fluid Interfacial Areas Measured with X-ray Microtomography and Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Tests for the same Samples.

Authors:  Kieran McDonald; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 5.240

5.  Aggregate-based sub-CMC Solubilization of n-Alkanes by Monorhamnolipid Biosurfactant.

Authors:  Hua Zhong; Xin Yang; Fei Tan; Mark L Brusseau; Lei Yang; Zhifeng Liu; Guangming Zeng; Xingzhong Yuan
Journal:  New J Chem       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.591

6.  Revisiting the horizontal redistribution of water in soils: Experiments and numerical modeling.

Authors:  L Zhuang; S M Hassanizadeh; P J Kleingeld; M Th van Genuchten
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.