Literature DB >> 16862596

The safety of breast-conserving surgery in patients who achieve a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Florentia Peintinger1, W Fraser Symmans, Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo, Judy C Boughey, Aman U Buzdar, T Kuan Yu, Kelly K Hunt, S Eva Singletary, Gildy V Babiera, Anthony Lucci, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Henry M Kuerer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to determine the locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate and to evaluate the correlation between surgical resection volume (RV) and LRR in patients with breast cancer who underwent segmental mastectomy after achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) on neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: The authors reviewed the outcomes of all 109 patients who underwent segmental mastectomy after the complete eradication of invasive disease by neoadjuvant chemotherapy at their institution between 1987 and 2002. LRRs were recorded, and RVs after segmental mastectomy were calculated and categorized as small, medium, or large.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 3 patients (2.7%) developed LRR. In 2 of those patients, the recurrence was located in the ipsilateral breast; in the other patient, the recurrence was located in the supraclavicular lymph nodes with synchronous distant metastases. The median RV was 73.12 cm3 (range, 2.82-451.51 cm3). Large RVs (>125 cm3) were less common than small RVs (up to 70 cm3) or medium RVs (between 70 cm3 and 125 cm3; P = .009 and P<.0001, respectively). One patient with a small RV had an LRR at 4 years, and 2 patients with medium RVs had LLRs at 2.3 years and 6 years, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year LRR-free survival rates were 98.1% and 96.5%, respectively, and the corresponding overall survival rates were 96% and 92%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Segmental mastectomy was associated with excellent locoregional control in patients who achieved a pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective studies are needed to examine whether decreasing the RVs in this patient population leads to an increased LRR rate. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16862596     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: use and trends in radiotherapy practice.

Authors:  T A Koulis; K Beecham; C Speers; S Tyldesley; D Voduc; C Simmons; R Olson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Predictors of recurrence in breast cancer patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Tanioka; C Shimizu; K Yonemori; K Yoshimura; K Tamura; T Kouno; M Ando; N Katsumata; H Tsuda; T Kinoshita; Y Fujiwara
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Impact of MRI-evaluated neoadjuvant chemotherapy response on change of surgical recommendation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Byron A Feig; David J-B Hsiang; John A Butler; Rita S Mehta; Shadfar Bahri; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Pathological response rate in hormone-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant FEC and triweekly docetaxel: a case series.

Authors:  Takayoshi Kiba; Nao Morii; Hirotoshi Takahashi; Shinji Ozaki; Misao Atsumi; Fumi Masumoto; Hiroyasu Yamashiro
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 5.  Clinical application of magnetic resonance imaging in management of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Inhibition of VEGF-C modulates distal lymphatic remodeling and secondary metastasis.

Authors:  Alvin Gogineni; Maresa Caunt; Ailey Crow; Chingwei V Lee; Germaine Fuh; Nicholas van Bruggen; Weilan Ye; Robby M Weimer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy varies in the treatment of women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Adedayo A Onitilo; Jill K Onesti; Richard M Single; Jessica M Engel; Ted A James; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Tom Barney; Laurence E McCahill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  José H Volders; Vera L Negenborn; Pauline E Spronk; Nicole M A Krekel; Linda J Schoonmade; Sybren Meijer; Isabel T Rubio; M Petrousjka van den Tol
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  The role of PET and MRI in evaluating the feasibility of skin-sparing mastectomy following neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Fatma Umit Malya; Huseyin Kadioglu; Huseyin Kazim Bektasoglu; Zuhal Gucin; Seyma Yildiz; Mehmet Guzel; Ezgi Basak Erdogan; Serap Yucel; Yeliz Emine Ersoy
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in China.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Si-Yu Wu; Miao Mo; Qin Xiao; Xia Yang; Ying-Ying Liu; Jian-Wei Li; Zhi-Ming Shao; Guang-Yu Liu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.