BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the associations between journal country of origin and language and journal impact factor of general medicine journals. METHODS: For each "Medicine, General and Internal" journal listed in the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Journal Citation Reports (JCR), the 2003 impact factor, language (ie, English, multiple languages [including English], or non-English), and country of origin (ie, US or non-US) were determined. The mean log impact factors of the journals by language, country of origin, and a combination of country of origin and language were compared. RESULTS: Of the 102 "Medicine, General and Internal" journals listed in the ISI JCR, 41 (40%) were published in the US and 83 (81%) were published in English. English-language journals had a significantly greater 2003 mean log impact factor than non-English journals and journals originating in the US had a significantly greater impact factor than journals originating elsewhere. However, the mean log impact factor of English-language journals originating in the US did not differ significantly from that of English-language journals originating elsewhere. CONCLUSION: Journal impact factor is more associated with journal language (ie, English versus non-English), rather than journal country of origin.
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the associations between journal country of origin and language and journal impact factor of general medicine journals. METHODS: For each "Medicine, General and Internal" journal listed in the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Journal Citation Reports (JCR), the 2003 impact factor, language (ie, English, multiple languages [including English], or non-English), and country of origin (ie, US or non-US) were determined. The mean log impact factors of the journals by language, country of origin, and a combination of country of origin and language were compared. RESULTS: Of the 102 "Medicine, General and Internal" journals listed in the ISI JCR, 41 (40%) were published in the US and 83 (81%) were published in English. English-language journals had a significantly greater 2003 mean log impact factor than non-English journals and journals originating in the US had a significantly greater impact factor than journals originating elsewhere. However, the mean log impact factor of English-language journals originating in the US did not differ significantly from that of English-language journals originating elsewhere. CONCLUSION: Journal impact factor is more associated with journal language (ie, English versus non-English), rather than journal country of origin.
Authors: Simon Rieder; Charlotte S Bruse; Christoph W Michalski; Jörg Kleeff; Helmut Friess Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Alexander Gerber; Doris Klingelhoefer; David A Groneberg; Matthias Bundschuh Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Matthew E Falagas; Margarita Kyriakidou; George Spais; Efstathia Argiti; Konstantinos Z Vardakas Journal: Rambam Maimonides Med J Date: 2018-04-19