Literature DB >> 16861782

Dose-volume objectives in multi-criteria optimization.

Tarek Halabi1, David Craft, Thomas Bortfeld.   

Abstract

Unlike conventional optimization with dose-volume (DV) constraints, multi-criteria optimization (MCO) with DV objectives provides tradeoff information which we believe is necessary for choosing better treatment plans. We show that the MCO formulation with DV objectives is better suited to convex approximation than conventional formulations with DV constraints. We provide a relaxation of the integer programming formulation which reduces the computation time for a single plan from over 5 h to about 2 min, without significantly compromising the results. We also derive a heuristic to improve on the relaxed solutions, adding only a few additional minutes of computation time. We apply these techniques to a skull based tumour case and a paraspinal tumour case. Based on a careful examination of the driving terms in the relaxed formulation and the heuristic, we argue that our techniques should apply more generally for DV objectives in multi-objective IMRT treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16861782     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/15/014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Knowledge-Based Tradeoff Hyperplanes for Head and Neck Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Jiahan Zhang; Yaorong Ge; Yang Sheng; Chunhao Wang; Jiang Zhang; Yuan Wu; Qiuwen Wu; Fang-Fang Yin; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Evaluating target cold spots by the use of tail EUDs.

Authors:  Thomas Bortfeld; David Craft; James F Dempsey; Tarek Halabi; H Edwin Romeijn
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Reduced order constrained optimization (ROCO): clinical application to lung IMRT.

Authors:  Hans Stabenau; Linda Rivera; Ellen Yorke; Jie Yang; Renzhi Lu; Richard J Radke; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Integrating soft and hard dose-volume constraints into hierarchical constrained IMRT optimization.

Authors:  Sovanlal Mukherjee; Linda Hong; Joseph O Deasy; Masoud Zarepisheh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Increased organ sparing using shape-based treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Steven F Petit; Binbin Wu; Michael Kazhdan; André Dekker; Patricio Simari; Rachit Kumar; Russel Taylor; Joseph M Herman; Todd McNutt
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Reduced-order constrained optimization in IMRT planning.

Authors:  Renzhi Lu; Richard J Radke; Jie Yang; Laura Happersett; Ellen Yorke; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Inverse treatment planning for spinal robotic radiosurgery: an international multi-institutional benchmark trial.

Authors:  Oliver Blanck; Lei Wang; Wolfgang Baus; Jimm Grimm; Thomas Lacornerie; Joakim Nilsson; Sergii Luchkovskyi; Isabel Palazon Cano; Zhenyu Shou; Myriam Ayadi; Harald Treuer; Romain Viard; Frank-Andre Siebert; Mark K H Chan; Guido Hildebrandt; Jürgen Dunst; Detlef Imhoff; Stefan Wurster; Robert Wolff; Pantaleo Romanelli; Eric Lartigau; Robert Semrau; Scott G Soltys; Achim Schweikard
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  An Automated Treatment Plan Quality Control Tool for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Using a Voxel-Weighting Factor-Based Re-Optimization Algorithm.

Authors:  Ting Song; Nan Li; Masoud Zarepisheh; Yongbao Li; Quentin Gautier; Linghong Zhou; Loren Mell; Steve Jiang; Laura Cerviño
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and Tomotherapy.

Authors:  Mike Oliver; Will Ansbacher; Wayne A Beckham
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.