Literature DB >> 16861592

What coalition factors foster community capacity? Lessons learned from the Fighting Back Initiative.

Ronda C Zakocs1, Sarah Guckenburg.   

Abstract

Coalitions build community capacity by encouraging local organizations to expand services, programs, or policies (i.e., organizational capacity). The aim of the study was to identify coalition factors--resources, lead agency, governance, and leadership--that foster organizational capacity. Thirteen coalitions funded by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Fighting Back (FB) Initiative were examined in a multiple-site case study where coalition served as the unit of analysis. Organizational capacity was measured by creating a scale for each community based on changes in programs, services, or policies among eight types of organizations. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to identify relationships among organizational capacity and coalition factors. FB sites with greater organizational capacity shared seven characteristics: received more funds for coalition building; delayed establishing new lead agencies; were housed in agencies supportive of FB; maintained stable, participatory decision-making bodies; cultivated active involvement of local government; practiced collaborative leadership; and had effective, long-serving project directors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16861592     DOI: 10.1177/1090198106288492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  26 in total

1.  An assessment of the Pacific Regional Cancer Coalition: outcomes and implications of a regional coalition internal and external assessment.

Authors:  Angela U Sy; Karen A Heckert; Lee Buenconsejo-Lum; Johnny Hedson; Suresh Tamang; Neal Palafox
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-11

2.  Determinants of community coalition ability to support evidence-based programs.

Authors:  Louis D Brown; Mark E Feinberg; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2010-09

3.  Implications of Active Living by Design for broad adoption, successful implementation, and long-term sustainability.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Diane K King
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  A model-driven approach to qualitatively assessing the added value of community coalitions.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jane Herman; Adrienne Keller; Adam Davis; Ryan Ehrensberger; Sharon Telleen; Richard Kurz; Jill Heins Nesvold; Sally Findley; Tyra Bryant-Stephens; Mindy Benson; Leslie Fierro
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Advancing coalition theory: the effect of coalition factors on community capacity mediated by member engagement.

Authors:  Michelle C Kegler; Deanne W Swan
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2011-09-12

6.  Comparing the Functioning of Youth and Adult Partnerships for Health Promotion.

Authors:  Louis D Brown; Alisha H Redelfs; Thomas J Taylor; Reanna L Messer
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2015-09

7.  The Role of Collective Efficacy in Reducing Health Disparities: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jean Butel; Kathryn L Braun
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2019 Jan/Mar

8.  Assessing Community Coalition Capacity and its Association with Underage Drinking Prevention Effectiveness in the Context of the SPF SIG.

Authors:  Robert L Flewelling; Sean M Hanley
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2016-10

9.  Reciprocal relations between coalition functioning and the provision of implementation support.

Authors:  Louis D Brown; Mark E Feinberg; Valerie B Shapiro; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-01

10.  A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS APPROACH TO UNDERSTAND CHANGES IN A CANCER DISPARITIES COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP NETWORK.

Authors:  John S Luque; Dinorah Martinez Tyson; Shalanda A Bynum; Shalewa Noel-Thomas; Kristen J Wells; Susan T Vadaparampil; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  Ann Anthropol Pract       Date:  2011-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.