| Literature DB >> 16861585 |
Terry C Davis1, Doren D Fredrickson, Estela M Kennen, Sharon G Humiston, Connie L Arnold, Mackey S Quinlin, Joseph A Bocchini.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether an in-service for public health nurses (PHNs) and accompanying educational materials could improve vaccine risk/benefit communication. The content and timing of vaccine communication were recorded during 246 pre-and 217 postintervention visits in two public health immunization clinics. Pre-/postintervention comparisons showed PHN communication of severe side effects (13% vs. 44%, p < .0001) and their management (29% vs. 60%, p < .0001) increased. There was no significant change in discussion of vaccine benefits (48% vs. 51%) or common side effects (91% vs. 92%),screening for contraindications (71% vs. 77%), or distribution of written information (89% vs. 92%). More parents initiated vaccine questions postintervention (27% vs. 39%,p < .01) and were more satisfied with vaccine-risk communication (8.1 vs. 8.9 on a 10-point scale, p < .01). Average vaccine communication time increased from 16 to 22 seconds (p < .01).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16861585 DOI: 10.1177/1090198106288996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Educ Behav ISSN: 1090-1981