Literature DB >> 16861288

A cost-effectiveness analysis of implant overdentures.

N U Zitzmann1, C P Marinello, P Sendi.   

Abstract

Placement of dental implants may improve the retention and stability of complete dentures in edentulous patients. Treatment costs, however, substantially increase with implant treatment. We therefore performed a stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing implant-supported over-denture prostheses (4 implants), implant-retained overdentures (2 implants), and complete dentures, from the patient's perspective in Switzerland, to assess whether implant treatment in the mandible represents value for money spent. Twenty patients were included in each treatment group and were followed up for three years. Health outcomes were expressed in Quality-adjusted Prosthesis Years, and dental health care costs and time costs were recorded in year 2000 Swiss Francs (CHF 100 = US dollars 61). The cost per Quality-adjusted Prosthesis Year gained for implant treatment was CHF 9100 (2 implants) and CHF 19,800 (4 implants) over 3 years. Over a ten-year period, these threshold ratios were reduced to CHF 3800 (2 implants) and CHF 7100 (4 implants) per Quality-adjusted Prosthesis Year gained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16861288     DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  8 in total

1.  Bridging the gap between health and non-health investments: moving from cost-effectiveness analysis to a return on investment approach across sectors of economy.

Authors:  Pedram Sendi
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2008-03-20

2.  Are UK graduates equipped with the skill set required to meet the demands of the UK's edentulous population?

Authors:  H Mather; M Thomason; J Ellis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Cost-effectiveness of anterior implants versus fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  N U Zitzmann; G Krastl; R Weiger; S Kühl; P Sendi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  An economic evaluation of maxillary implant overdentures based on six vs. four implants.

Authors:  Stefan Listl; Leonhard Fischer; Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Measuring the Monetary Value of Dental Implants for Denture Retention: A Willingness to Pay Approach.

Authors:  Pedram Sendi; Nadine Bertschinger; Christina Brand; Carlo P Marinello; Heiner C Bucher; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-09-14

6.  Factors affecting the willingness to pay for implants: A study of patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Bishi Al Garni; Sharat Chandra Pani; Adel Almaaz; Ehsan Al Qeshtaini; Hamad Abu-Haimed; Khalid Al Sharif
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-11

Review 7.  A comparison of cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of two- implant-retained overdentures versus other removable prosthodontic treatment options for edentulous mandible: A systematic review.

Authors:  Shubhabrata Roy; Sourav Maji; Rahul Paul; Jayanta Bhattacharyya; Preeti Goel
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-04-07

8.  Prevalence of Missing Values and Protest Zeros in Contingent Valuation in Dental Medicine.

Authors:  Pedram Sendi; Arta Ramadani; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.