Literature DB >> 16860972

Component fears of claustrophobia associated with mock magnetic resonance imaging.

F Dudley McGlynn1, Todd A Smitherman, Jacinda C Hammel, Alejandro A Lazarte.   

Abstract

A conceptualization of claustrophobia [Rachman, S., & Taylor, S. (1993). Analyses of claustrophobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 7, 281-291] was evaluated in the context of magnetic resonance imaging. One hundred eleven students responded to questionnaires that quantified fear of suffocation, fear of restriction, and sensitivity to anxiety symptoms. Sixty-four of them were then exposed to a mock magnetic resonance imaging assessment; maximum subjective fear during the mock assessment was self-reported, behavioral reactions to the mock assessment were characterized, and heart rates before and during the assessment were recorded. Scores for fear of suffocation, fear of restriction, and anxiety sensitivity were used to predict subjective, behavioral, and cardiac fear. Subjective fear during the mock assessment was predicted by fears of suffocation and public anxiousness. Behavioral fear (escape/avoidance) was predicted by fears of restriction and suffocation, and sensitivity to symptoms related to suffocation. Cardiac fear was predicted by fear of public anxiousness. The criterion variance predicted was impressive, clearly sufficient to legitimize both the research preparation and the conceptualization of claustrophobia that was evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16860972     DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anxiety Disord        ISSN: 0887-6185


  5 in total

1.  Predictors of unsuccessful magnetic resonance imaging scanning in older generalized anxiety disorder patients and controls.

Authors:  Jan Mohlman; Dana A Eldreth; Rebecca B Price; Daniel Chazin; Dorie A Glover
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-02-12

2.  Anticipatory stress associated with functional magnetic resonance imaging: Implications for psychosocial stress research.

Authors:  Ethan W Gossett; Muriah D Wheelock; Adam M Goodman; Tyler R Orem; Nathaniel G Harnett; Kimberly H Wood; Sylvie Mrug; Douglas A Granger; David C Knight
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Reduction of claustrophobia with short-bore versus open magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith Enders; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Peter Martus; Randolf Klingebiel; Patrick Asbach; Christian Klessen; Gerd Diederichs; Moritz Wagner; Ulf Teichgräber; Thomas Bengner; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The impact of MRI scanner environment on perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Birte U Forstmann; Max C Keuken; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-03

5.  The functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) procedure as experienced by healthy participants and stroke patients--a pilot study.

Authors:  André J Szameitat; Shan Shen; Annette Sterr
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 1.930

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.