Literature DB >> 16860826

Productivity, dispersal and the coexistence of intraguild predators and prey.

Priyanga Amarasekare1.   

Abstract

A great deal is known about the influence of dispersal on species that interact via competition or predation, but very little is known about the influence of dispersal on species that interact via both competition and predation. Here, I investigate the influence of dispersal on the coexistence and abundance-productivity relationships of species that engage in intraguild predation (IGP: competing species that prey on each other). I report two key findings. First, dispersal enhances coexistence when a trade-off between resource competition and IGP is strong and/or when the Intraguild Prey has an overall advantage, and impedes coexistence when the trade-off is weak and/or when the Intraguild Predator has an overall advantage. Second, the Intraguild Prey's abundance-productivity relationship depends crucially on the dispersal rate of the Intraguild Predator, but the Intraguild Predator's abundance-productivity relationship is unaffected by its own dispersal rate or that of the Intraguild Prey. This difference arises because the two species engage in both a competitive interaction as well as an antagonistic (predator-prey) interaction. The Intraguild Prey, being the intermediate consumer, has to balance the conflicting demands of resource acquisition and predator avoidance, while the Intraguild Predator has to contend only with resource acquisition. Thus, the Intraguild Predator's abundance increases monotonically with resource productivity regardless of either species' dispersal rate, while the Intraguild Prey's abundance-productivity relationship can increase, decrease, or become hump-shaped with increasing productivity depending on the Intraguild Predator's dispersal rate. The important implication is that a species' trophic position determines the effectiveness of dispersal in sampling spatial environmental heterogeneity. The dispersal behavior of a top predator is likely to have a stronger effect on coexistence and spatial patterns of abundance than the dispersal behavior of an intermediate consumer.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16860826     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  6 in total

1.  Trophic omnivory across a productivity gradient: intraguild predation theory and the structure and strength of species interactions.

Authors:  Mark Novak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Intraguild predation with evolutionary dispersal in a spatially heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  Wonhyung Choi; Seunghyeon Baek; Inkyung Ahn
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 3.  Intraguild predation provides a selection mechanism for bacterial antagonistic compounds.

Authors:  J J Leisner; J Haaber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Coexistence in streams: do source-sink dynamics allow salamanders to persist with fish predators?

Authors:  Adam J Sepulveda; Winsor H Lowe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Adaptive and variable intraguild predators facilitate local coexistence in an intraguild predation module.

Authors:  San-He Wu; Toshinori Okuyama
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  Integrating the underlying structure of stochasticity into community ecology.

Authors:  Lauren G Shoemaker; Lauren L Sullivan; Ian Donohue; Juliano S Cabral; Ryan J Williams; Margaret M Mayfield; Jonathan M Chase; Chengjin Chu; W Stanley Harpole; Andreas Huth; Janneke HilleRisLambers; Aubrie R M James; Nathan J B Kraft; Felix May; Ranjan Muthukrishnan; Sean Satterlee; Franziska Taubert; Xugao Wang; Thorsten Wiegand; Qiang Yang; Karen C Abbott
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 5.499

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.