Jeffrey S McCombs1, Jeonghoon Ahn, Thomas Tencer, Lizheng Shi. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9004, USA. jmccombs@usc.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The cost of unrecognized bipolar disorders over time is unknown. METHODS: Ten years of data from the California Medicaid program were used to identify depressed patients initiating new episodes of antidepressant therapy and with 6+ years of post-treatment data. Recognized bipolar (RBP) patients received a BP diagnosis or used mood stabilizers in the pre-index period. Unrecognized bipolar (UBP) patients received an initial BP diagnosis or used a mood stabilizer in the post-index period. Depression-only (MDD) patients had no BP diagnosis or mood stabilizer use. Three analyses were conducted: (1) regression models of cost per year, (2) a regression model of aggregate cost over 6 years and (3) a time trend analysis of the costs for UBP patients. RESULTS: 14,809 patients were identified: RBP 14.5%, UBP 28.2% and MDD 57.3%. The growth in costs per month for UBP patients over 6 years (171%) far exceeds the growth for RBP and MDD patients (82% and 95%, respectively). RBP and MDD patients cost 2316 dollars and 1681 dollars less per year in the 6th year relative to UBP patients (p<0.0001 for both estimates). The cost per month increased by 91 dollars for each month of delayed diagnosis (p=0.011). Costs for UBP patients increased by 10 dollars per month prior to their initial BP diagnosis (p<0.001) and by -1.01 dollars thereafter (p=0.006 for the change in slope). LIMITATIONS: Classification of patients based on diagnosis or mood stabilizer use using paid claims data is inexact. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis of bipolar disorders may significantly reduce health care cost.
INTRODUCTION: The cost of unrecognized bipolar disorders over time is unknown. METHODS: Ten years of data from the California Medicaid program were used to identify depressedpatients initiating new episodes of antidepressant therapy and with 6+ years of post-treatment data. Recognized bipolar (RBP) patients received a BP diagnosis or used mood stabilizers in the pre-index period. Unrecognized bipolar (UBP) patients received an initial BP diagnosis or used a mood stabilizer in the post-index period. Depression-only (MDD) patients had no BP diagnosis or mood stabilizer use. Three analyses were conducted: (1) regression models of cost per year, (2) a regression model of aggregate cost over 6 years and (3) a time trend analysis of the costs for UBPpatients. RESULTS: 14,809 patients were identified: RBP 14.5%, UBP 28.2% and MDD 57.3%. The growth in costs per month for UBPpatients over 6 years (171%) far exceeds the growth for RBP and MDDpatients (82% and 95%, respectively). RBP and MDDpatients cost 2316 dollars and 1681 dollars less per year in the 6th year relative to UBPpatients (p<0.0001 for both estimates). The cost per month increased by 91 dollars for each month of delayed diagnosis (p=0.011). Costs for UBPpatients increased by 10 dollars per month prior to their initial BP diagnosis (p<0.001) and by -1.01 dollars thereafter (p=0.006 for the change in slope). LIMITATIONS: Classification of patients based on diagnosis or mood stabilizer use using paid claims data is inexact. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis of bipolar disorders may significantly reduce health care cost.
Authors: Chi Ming Leung; Chi Lap Yim; Connie T Y Yan; Cheuk Chi Chan; Yu-Tao Xiang; Arthur D P Mak; Marcella Lei-Yee Fok; Gabor S Ungvari Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: G M Goodwin; P M Haddad; I N Ferrier; J K Aronson; Trh Barnes; A Cipriani; D R Coghill; S Fazel; J R Geddes; H Grunze; E A Holmes; O Howes; S Hudson; N Hunt; I Jones; I C Macmillan; H McAllister-Williams; D R Miklowitz; R Morriss; M Munafò; C Paton; B J Saharkian; Kea Saunders; Jma Sinclair; D Taylor; E Vieta; A H Young Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 4.153