Literature DB >> 16860135

Targeted genomic microarray analysis for identification of chromosome abnormalities in 1500 consecutive clinical cases.

Lisa G Shaffer1, Catherine D Kashork, Reza Saleki, Emily Rorem, Kyle Sundin, Blake C Ballif, Bassem A Bejjani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the yield of array-based comparative genomic hybridization. STUDY
DESIGN: The results of array comparative genomic hybridization were collected on 1500 consecutive clinical cases sent to our laboratory for a variety of developmental problems. Confirmation fluorescence in situ hybridization of metaphase or interphase cells, depending on the aberration, was performed.
RESULTS: Of the 1500 cases, 134 (8.9%) showed an abnormality: 36 (2.4%) showed polymorphisms or familial variants, 14 (0.9%) showed alterations of unknown clinical significance, and 84 (5.6%) showed clinically relevant genomic alterations. These included subtelomeric deletions and unbalanced rearrangements, microdeletions and reciprocal duplications, rare abnormalities, and low-level trisomy mosaicism.
CONCLUSIONS: A targeted array detects a substantial proportion of abnormalities even in those patients who have already had extensive cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization testing. This study, although not a controlled ascertainment of subjects with specific selection criteria, accurately reflects the reality of clinical cytogenetic practice and provides an estimate of the cytogenetic abnormalities that can be identified with a targeted microarray in a diagnostic laboratory. Microarray analysis likely doubles the current yield of abnormal results detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16860135     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  53 in total

1.  Copy number detection in discordant monozygotic twins of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) and Esophageal Atresia (EA) cohorts.

Authors:  Danielle Veenma; Erwin Brosens; Elisabeth de Jong; Cees van de Ven; Connie Meeussen; Titia Cohen-Overbeek; Marjan Boter; Hubertus Eussen; Hannie Douben; Dick Tibboel; Annelies de Klein
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Use of array genomic hybridization technology for constitutional genetic diagnosis in Canada.

Authors:  Alessandra Mv Duncan; Bernard Chodirker
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 3.  Diagnostic genome profiling: unbiased whole genome or targeted analysis?

Authors:  Joris A Veltman; Bert B A de Vries
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Three clinical experiences with SNP array results consistent with parental incest: a narrative with lessons learned.

Authors:  Benjamin M Helm; Katherine Langley; Brooke Spangler; Samantha Vergano
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Genome-wide oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization for etiological diagnosis of mental retardation: a multicenter experience of 1499 clinical cases.

Authors:  Bixia Xiang; Hongbo Zhu; Yiping Shen; David T Miller; Kangmo Lu; Xiaofeng Hu; Hans C Andersson; Tarachandra M Narumanchi; Yueying Wang; Jose E Martinez; Bai-Lin Wu; Peining Li; Marilyn M Li; Tian-Jian Chen; Yao-Shan Fan
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Diverse mutational mechanisms cause pathogenic subtelomeric rearrangements.

Authors:  Yue Luo; Karen E Hermetz; Jodi M Jackson; Jennifer G Mulle; Anne Dodd; Karen D Tsuchiya; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer; Jannine D Cody; David H Ledbetter; Christa L Martin; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Complex structural rearrangement features suggesting chromoanagenesis mechanism in a case of 1p36 deletion syndrome.

Authors:  Évelin Aline Zanardo; Flavia Balbo Piazzon; Roberta Lelis Dutra; Alexandre Torchio Dias; Marília Moreira Montenegro; Gil Monteiro Novo-Filho; Thaís Virgínia Moura Machado Costa; Amom Mendes Nascimento; Chong Ae Kim; Leslie Domenici Kulikowski
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Identification of chromosome abnormalities in subtelomeric regions by microarray analysis: a study of 5,380 cases.

Authors:  Lina Shao; Chad A Shaw; Xin-Yan Lu; Trilochan Sahoo; Carlos A Bacino; Seema R Lalani; Pawel Stankiewicz; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Yinfeng Li; Sarah Neill; Amber N Pursley; A Craig Chinault; Ankita Patel; Arthur L Beaudet; James R Lupski; Sau W Cheung
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  SNP array mapping of chromosome 20p deletions: genotypes, phenotypes, and copy number variation.

Authors:  Binita M Kamath; Brian D Thiel; Xiaowu Gai; Laura K Conlin; Pedro S Munoz; Joseph Glessner; Dinah Clark; Daniel M Warthen; Tamim H Shaikh; Ercan Mihci; David A Piccoli; Struan F A Grant; Hakon Hakonarson; Ian D Krantz; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.