Literature DB >> 16860011

Usefulness of fractional flow reserve measurements to defer revascularization in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris, non-ST-elevation and ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction, or atypical chest pain.

Jean-Michel Potvin1, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Olivier F Bertrand, Onil Gleeton, Can Nanh Nguyen, Gerald Barbeau, Guy Proulx, Robert De Larochellière, Jean-Pierre Déry, Nuria Batalla, Ali Dana, Alvaro Facta, Louis Roy.   

Abstract

This study determined the safety of deferring coronary revascularization based on a fractional flow reserve (FFR) value > or = 0.75 in a series of consecutive unselected coronary patients with moderate coronary lesions, including patients with unstable angina, myocardial infarction (MI), and/or positive noninvasive test findings. The study included 201 consecutive coronary patients (mean age 62 +/- 10 years; 65% men) with 231 lesions evaluated by FFR measurement for which revascularization was deferred based on a FFR value > or = 0.75. Lesions associated with a positive noninvasive test result were those located in an artery supplying a myocardial territory in which myocardial ischemia was demonstrated by a noninvasive test. Cardiac events (cardiac death, MI, revascularization) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class were evaluated at follow-up. Indications for coronary angiography included unstable angina or MI (62%), stable angina (30%), or atypical chest pain (8%). Forty-four patients (22%) had > or = 1 coronary lesion associated with a positive noninvasive test result in which FFR was evaluated. Mean FFR value was 0.87 +/- 0.06 and mean lesion percent diameter stenosis was 41 +/- 8%. At 11 +/- 6 months of follow-up, cardiac events occurred in 20 patients (10%), and no significant differences were observed between patients with unstable angina or MI and those with stable angina (9% vs 13%, p = 0.44) or between patients with and without lesions associated with positive noninvasive test results (9% vs 10%, p = 1.00). At the end of follow-up, 88% of patients were asymptomatic in angina class 0 or I, with no differences across various groups. In conclusion, these results suggest that patients with moderate coronary lesions can be safely managed without revascularization on the basis of FFR measurements, irrespective of clinical presentation and/or presence of positive noninvasive test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16860011     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  The Quebec Heart Institute: 50 years of excellence in cardiology.

Authors:  Gilles R Dagenais; François Philippon; Jean-Pierre Després; Jean G Dumesnil; Paul Cartier; Peter M Bogaty; Michel Lemieux; André Moisan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Fractional flow reserve: the past, present and future.

Authors:  Jeong-Eun Kim; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Guoxin Fan; Deqiu Zhu; Wanrong Ma; Changqing Yang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAMOUS-NSTEMI): rationale and design of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Colin Berry; Jamie Layland; Arvind Sood; Nick P Curzen; Kanarath P Balachandran; Raj Das; Shahid Junejo; Robert A Henderson; Andrew H Briggs; Ian Ford; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 5.  Fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes: A review.

Authors:  Nikunj R Shah; Rasha Al-Lamee; Justin Davies
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2014-11-11

6.  Association of Lower Fractional Flow Reserve Values With Higher Risk of Adverse Cardiac Events for Lesions Deferred Revascularization Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Shriti Masrani Mehta; Jeremiah P Depta; Eric Novak; Jayendrakumar S Patel; Yogesh Patel; David Raymer; Gabrielle Facey; Alan Zajarias; John M Lasala; Jasvindar Singh; Richard G Bach; Howard I Kurz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial.

Authors:  Jamie Layland; Keith G Oldroyd; Nick Curzen; Arvind Sood; Kanarath Balachandran; Raj Das; Shahid Junejo; Nadeem Ahmed; Matthew M Y Lee; Aadil Shaukat; Anna O'Donnell; Julian Nam; Andrew Briggs; Robert Henderson; Alex McConnachie; Colin Berry
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Comparison of Approaches to Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials.

Authors:  Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Rajat Kalra; Himanshu Aggarwal; Sameer Ather; Saurabh Gaba; Garima Arora; David C McGiffin; Mustafa Ahmed; Stella Aslibekyan; Pankaj Arora
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  Evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses in acute coronary syndromes using pressure guidewire.

Authors:  Giampaolo Niccoli; Ciro Indolfi; Justin E Davies
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-06-14

10.  Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Acute Coronary Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  José Luís Martins; Vera Afreixo; José Santos; Lino Gonçalves
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.