OBJECTIVE: To characterise the activation of the contra- and ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex (SI) after tactile stimulation of the face. METHODS: Trigeminal somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (TSEFs) were recorded after tactile stimulation of the lower lip, cheek, chin and forehead in 11 healthy subjects. The responses were determined visually from the waveforms and modelled with equivalent current dipoles (ECDs). RESULTS: Contralateral SI responses were evoked in all subjects after lip stimulation, and in 91% and 64% after right and left cheek, 73% and 82% after chin and 64% and 27% after forehead stimulation. The responses usually showed an early double-peak wave pattern, the underlying sources localising to the SI. In addition, altogether 37 ipsilateral SI responses were evoked in eight subjects. Fourteen of these responses were amenable to ECD modelling and localised to ipsilateral SI. CONCLUSIONS: Tactile stimulation of the lip area reliably activates the contralateral SI in normal subjects, but the success rate for other trigeminal areas is lower. Ipsilateral responses can be present after stimulation of any of the trigeminal branches in normal subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Recording of TSEFs after tactile stimulation of particularly the lip area provides a non-invasive technique to study the function of the trigeminal nerve.
OBJECTIVE: To characterise the activation of the contra- and ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex (SI) after tactile stimulation of the face. METHODS: Trigeminal somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (TSEFs) were recorded after tactile stimulation of the lower lip, cheek, chin and forehead in 11 healthy subjects. The responses were determined visually from the waveforms and modelled with equivalent current dipoles (ECDs). RESULTS:Contralateral SI responses were evoked in all subjects after lip stimulation, and in 91% and 64% after right and left cheek, 73% and 82% after chin and 64% and 27% after forehead stimulation. The responses usually showed an early double-peak wave pattern, the underlying sources localising to the SI. In addition, altogether 37 ipsilateral SI responses were evoked in eight subjects. Fourteen of these responses were amenable to ECD modelling and localised to ipsilateral SI. CONCLUSIONS: Tactile stimulation of the lip area reliably activates the contralateral SI in normal subjects, but the success rate for other trigeminal areas is lower. Ipsilateral responses can be present after stimulation of any of the trigeminal branches in normal subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Recording of TSEFs after tactile stimulation of particularly the lip area provides a non-invasive technique to study the function of the trigeminal nerve.
Authors: Aurelio A Alonso; Ioannis G Koutlas; Arthur C Leuthold; Scott M Lewis; Apostolos P Georgopoulos Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Mihai Popescu; Steven Barlow; Elena-Anda Popescu; Meredith E Estep; Lalit Venkatesan; Edward T Auer; William M Brooks Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-05-31 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Chin-Hsuan Lin; Tim M Tierney; Niall Holmes; Elena Boto; James Leggett; Sven Bestmann; Richard Bowtell; Matthew J Brookes; Gareth R Barnes; R Chris Miall Journal: J Physiol Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 5.182