Literature DB >> 1685978

Lifetime energy budgets in mammals and birds.

K D Jürgens1, J Prothero.   

Abstract

1. Two data sets for standard energy metabolism (351 and 320 species, respectively) and one for maximal lifespan (494 species) in mammals have been assembled from the literature. 2. In addition smaller data sets of active (field) energy metabolism in mammals (36 species) and in birds (25 species) have been drawn on. 3. The products of the respective regression parameters as well as the products of energy metabolism and maximal lifespan in individual species have been computed in order to estimate lifetime energy metabolism in mammals generally and in various mammalian orders. 4. It is found that lifetime energy budgets in mammals generally, whether standard or active, very systematically with body mass with slopes between 0.87 and 0.93, significantly different from unity (P less than 0.001 or P less than 0.01). 5. In birds, lifetime energy budgets, whether standard or active, vary with slopes of 0.94 +/- 0.05 and 0.88 +/- 0.09, which are not significantly different from unity (P greater than 0.1). 6. In carnivores, artiodactyls, primates and bats the slopes for lifetime standard as well as lifetime active energy budgets are not significantly different from one in any of the investigated data sets. 7. In rodents the lifetime standard energy budgets have slope significantly different from one; in marsupials one data set for lifetime standard and the one for lifetime active energy budget lead to slopes significantly different from one. 8. It is concluded from this analysis that current data do not support the hypothesis that lifetime energy budgets, whether standard or active, vary as the first power of body mass in mammals generally.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1685978     DOI: 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90393-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0300-9629


  1 in total

1.  Urinary C-peptide measurement as a marker of nutritional status in macaques.

Authors:  Cédric Girard-Buttoz; James P Higham; Michael Heistermann; Stefan Wedegärtner; Dario Maestripieri; Antje Engelhardt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.