Literature DB >> 16857511

Extensibility and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of 5 pediatric anterior capsulotomy techniques in a porcine model.

Rupal H Trivedi1, M Edward Wilson, Luanna R Bartholomew.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the extensibility and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of 5 currently used pediatric anterior capsulotomy techniques: vitrectorhexis, manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC), can-opener, radio frequency diathermy, and plasma blade in a porcine model.
SETTING: Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
METHODS: Extensibility was determined by stretching each capsulotomy until it ruptured and measuring it by calculating the mean stretch-to-rupture circumference of each capsulotomy (20 eyes per technique) as a percentage of its baseline circumference. Edge characteristics were evaluated using SEM.
RESULTS: The mean extensibility of each technique tested (vitrectorhexis 161%, CCC 185%, can opener 149%, radio frequency 145%, plasma blade 170%) was significantly different (P<.001, 1-way analysis of variance). The SEM examination found that the vitrectorhexis had a scalloped edge with the whole edge rolled over, presenting a smooth surface toward the inside of the capsulotomy; the manual CCC produced the smoothest edge, with no irregularities noted; the can-opener edge was irregular, showing each puncture of the needle had created a small arc, with occasional regions of the edge rolled over in a "hit-and-miss" fashion; the radio-frequency diathermy capsulotomy edge was ragged, rough, and irregular; and the plasma blade capsulotomy edge was rougher than the manual CCC, but there were fewer irregularities than the radio-frequency diathermy edge had.
CONCLUSIONS: The manual CCC technique produced the most extensible porcine capsulotomy, followed by the plasma blade, vitrectorhexis, can-opener, and radio-frequency techniques, in a porcine model. The manual CCC technique also produced the smoothest anterior capsulotomy edge according SEM evaluation.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16857511     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Morphological changes in the edge structures following femtosecond laser capsulotomy with varied patient interfaces and different energy settings.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Oliver K Klaproth; Marko Ostovic; Fritz H Hengerer; Wolfgang J Mayer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  A review of femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery for Hawai'i.

Authors:  Ming Chen
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2013-05

3.  Capsulorhexis: Pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Reza Erfanian; Nasser Karimi
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

4.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: a current review.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Daniel S Churgin; Maylon Hsu
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10

Review 5.  Pediatric cataract: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Anagha Medsinge; Ken K Nischal
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-07

6.  Methods of advanced wound management for care of combined traumatic and chemical warfare injuries.

Authors:  John S Graham; Travis W Gerlach; Thomas P Logan; James P Bonar; Richard J Fugo; Robyn B Lee; Matthew A Coatsworth
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2008-07-21

7.  Vitrectorhexis versus forceps posterior capsulorhexis in pediatric cataract surgery.

Authors:  Lav Kochgaway; Partha Biswas; Ajoy Paul; Sourav Sinha; Rupak Biswas; Puspen Maity; Sumita Banerjee
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.848

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.