Literature DB >> 16857345

Diagnosing delusions: a review of inter-rater reliability.

Vaughan Bell1, Peter W Halligan, Hadyn D Ellis.   

Abstract

Although several studies have examined the reliability of diagnosing delusions there is no comprehensive review of the literature. Therefore, the reliability of diagnosing 'delusions in general' and the subcategory of 'bizarre delusions' was reviewed, including both structured interview and standardized instrument methods. The literature suggests that delusions in general can be diagnosed reliably with both structured interview and standardized instruments. However, bizarre delusions are not reliably diagnosed by either, suggesting that this concept may have little clinical validity. Nevertheless, many of the studies reviewed are poorly designed or subject to significant confounds. Criteria are suggested for adequate future studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16857345     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  8 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting the diagnosis of schizophrenia: where have we been and where are we going?

Authors:  William R Keller; Bernard A Fischer; William T Carpenter
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 2.  Psychosis prediction and clinical utility in familial high-risk studies: selective review, synthesis, and implications for early detection and intervention.

Authors:  Jai L Shah; Neeraj Tandon; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.732

Review 3.  What is bizarre in bizarre delusions? A critical review.

Authors:  M Cermolacce; L Sass; J Parnas
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Do we have any solid evidence of clinical utility about the pathophysiology of schizophrenia?

Authors:  Stephen M Lawrie; Bayanne Olabi; Jeremy Hall; Andrew M McIntosh
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  Bipolar Disorder Patients Follow-up (BDPF): methods and materials.

Authors:  Amir Shabani; Aida Taheri; Sanaz Azadforouz; Chehreh Najd Abbasi; Zahra Mousavi; Kambiz Zangeneh; Seyed Vahid Shariat; Shabnam Nohesara; Morteza Naserbakht; Mojgan Taban; Sadaf Kokar; Samaneh Teimoorinejad; Mitra Hakimshooshtary; Elham Shirazi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  A cognitive account of belief: a tentative road map.

Authors:  Michael H Connors; Peter W Halligan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-13

7.  Non-Compliance and Related Factors in Patients With Bipolar I Disorder: A Six Month Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Sanaz Azadforouz; Amir Shabani; Shabnam Nohesara; Masoud Ahmadzad-Asl
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci       Date:  2016-03-15

8.  Improving Criminal Responsibility Determinations Using Structured Professional Judgment.

Authors:  Marvin W Acklin; Joseph P Velasquez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.