Literature DB >> 16856224

Millions of missing girls: from fetal sexing to high technology sex selection in India.

Sabu M George1.   

Abstract

The morality and acceptability of using prenatal diagnosis for sex selection is being extensively debated around the world as advances in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and embryology have enabled selective implantation of embryos of the desired sex (George and Dahiya, 1998; Savulescu, 1999; Raphael, 2002; Harris, 2005; Robertson, 2005; Snider, 2005). Sophisticated methods of separation of semen, originally developed for cattle breeding, are being used for human sex selection. Recently, non-invasive methods of fetal sex determination in the first trimester (from 6 weeks) of pregnancy have also emerged (Hahn and Chitty, 2005). Market forces that promote sex selection along with libertarian ideologues have assisted in blurring the ethical limits (Paul, 2001; President's Council on Bioethics, 2003). The widespread misuse of sex selection for eliminating girls before birth in India and among the Indian diaspora needs to be brought into the global 'intellectual discourse'. It is imperative that Western ethicists recognize the genocidal nature of sex selection taking place in certain Asian countries. Even if they believe that these trends will not affect mainstream Western societies, the promotion or tolerance of sex selection amounts to a 'crime of silence' against this ongoing genocide in China and India. I have been concerned with issues of the girl child in India for over two decades and sex selection among Asian Indians in North America (George et al., 1992; George et al., 1993; George and Dahiya, 1998). This article examines the missing millions of girls, but will not consider the 1980s campaign against fetal sex determination, Indian feminists' recognition of sex selection as violence against women (unlike several Western feminists, Moazam, 2004), or the Government's response to regulate prenatal diagnostic techniques in 1994 (George and Dahiya, 1998; George, 2002). Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16856224     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  13 in total

1.  Sex ratio patterns according to Asian ethnicity in Québec, 1981-2004.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Mark Daniel; Spencer Moore
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Is human enhancement also a personal matter?

Authors:  Vincent Menuz; Thierry Hurlimann; Béatrice Godard
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011.

Authors:  Prabhat Jha; Maya A Kesler; Rajesh Kumar; Faujdar Ram; Usha Ram; Lukasz Aleksandrowicz; Diego G Bassani; Shailaja Chandra; Jayant K Banthia
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Live birth sex ratios and father's geographic origins in Jerusalem, 1964-1976.

Authors:  J Groeger; M Opler; K Kleinhaus; M C Perrin; R Calderon-Margalit; O Manor; O Paltiel; D Conley; S Harlap; D Malaspina
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 1.937

Review 5.  Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Testing across the World: A Comparison of International Policy and Ethical Perspectives.

Authors:  Margaret E C Ginoza; Rosario Isasi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  Testing for Down Syndrome in Catholic Health Care: Complicity in Eugenic Abortion.

Authors:  James G Linn
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-12-22

7.  Response to Dalal et al.

Authors:  Kamlesh Madan; Martijn H Breuning
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  The Israeli National Committee for sex selection by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a novel approach (2005-2011).

Authors:  Nirit Pessach; Saralee Glasser; Varda Soskolne; Amihai Barash; Liat Lerner-Geva
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-10-28

9.  Impact of prenatal technologies on the sex ratio in India: an overview.

Authors:  Kamlesh Madan; Martijn H Breuning
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Neonatal outcomes in relation to sex differences: a national cohort survey in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yi-Hao Weng; Chun-Yuh Yang; Ya-Wen Chiu
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.