Literature DB >> 16855976

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception.

H G Al-Inany1, A M Abou-Setta, M Aboulghar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists produce immediate suppression of gonadotrophin secretion, hence, they can be given after starting gonadotrophin administration. This has resulted in dramatic reduction in the duration of treatment cycle. Two different regimes have been described. The multiple-dose protocol involves the administration of 0.25 mg cetrorelix (or ganirelix) daily from day six to seven of stimulation, or when the leading follicle is 14 to15 mm, until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration and the single-dose protocol involves the single administration of 3 mg cetrorelix on day seven to eight of stimulation. Assuming comparable clinical outcome, these benefits would justify a change from the standard long protocol of GnRH agonists to the new GnRH antagonist regimens.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the evidence regarding the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists with the standard long protocol of GnRH agonists for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted conception. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1987 to February 2006, and handsearched bibliographies of relevant publications and reviews, and abstracts of scientific meetings. We also contacted manufacturers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled studies comparing different protocols of GnRH antagonists with GnRH agonists in assisted conception cycles were included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. If relevant data were missing or unclear, the authors have been consulted MAIN
RESULTS: Twenty seven RCTs comparing the GnRH antagonist to the long protocol of GnRH agonist fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the antagonist group. (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72 - 0.97). The ongoing pregnancy/ live-birth rate showed the same significant lower pregnancy in the antagonist group (P = 0.03; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98).However, there was statistically significant reduction in incidence of severe OHSS with antagonist protocol. The relative risk ratio was (P = 0.01; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.89). In addition, interventions to prevent OHSS (e.g. coasting, cycle cancellation) were administered more frequently in the agonist group (P = 0.03; OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.93). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: GnRH antagonist protocol is a short and simple protocol with good clinical outcome with significant reduction in incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and amount of gonadotrophins but the lower pregnancy rate compared to the GnRH agonist long protocol necessitates counseling subfertile couples before recommending change from GnRH agonist to antagonist..

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16855976     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001750.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  45 in total

1.  Prolonged gonadotropin stimulation is associated with decreased ART success.

Authors:  Meleen Chuang; Athena Zapantis; Martina Taylor; Sangita K Jindal; Genevieve S Neal-Perry; Harry J Lieman; Alex Joel Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The effects of GnRH antagonist on the endometrium of normally menstruating women.

Authors:  Porntip Sirayapiwat; Somchai Suwajanakorn; Surang Triratanachat; Somchai Niruthisard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Early pregnancy loss rates were different among singleton gestations conceived by ICSI using GnRH agonist and antagonist.

Authors:  Mustafa Bahceci; Ulun Ulug; Alper Sismanoglu; Suleyman Tosun; Bora Cengiz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Comparison of embryological and clinical outcome in GnRH antagonist vs. GnRH agonist protocols for in vitro fertilization in PCOS non-obese patients. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Rafal Kurzawa; Przemyslaw Ciepiela; Tomasz Baczkowski; Krzysztof Safranow; Pawel Brelik
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Anti-Mullerian hormone normogram in an Irish subfertile population.

Authors:  M N Naasan; C Harrity; L Pentony; E Mocanu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  Novel Concepts for Inducing Final Oocyte Maturation in In Vitro Fertilization Treatment.

Authors:  Ali Abbara; Sophie A Clarke; Waljit S Dhillo
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  Gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist in IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Kamath Ms; Mangalraj Am; Muthukumar Km; George K
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2008-01

8.  A novel approach using a minimal number of injections during the IVF/ICSI cycle: Luteal half-dose depot GnRH agonist following corifollitropin alfa versus the corifollitropin alfa with a GnRH-antagonist cycle.

Authors:  Bülent Haydardedeoğlu; Esra Bulgan Kılıçdağ
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 9.  Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Authors:  P Devroey; B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jørn Wetterslev; Kristian Thorlund; Jesper Brok; Christian Gluud
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.