Literature DB >> 16855890

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of gluteal fat grafts.

Germán A Wolf1, Sabrina Gallego, Alfredo S Patrón, Federico Ramírez, Jorge A de Delgado, Alberto Echeverri, Mónica M García.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One goal of lipoplasty is to create a round and projected buttock contour. Despite multiple papers evaluating lipoinjection, controversies still remain.
METHODS: This report describes a series of patients who underwent liposuction, gluteal lipoinjection, and evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). From January 2003 to January 2004, the patients scheduled for contour surgery by the investigators were evaluated using MRI, photographic records, and gluteal circumference measurement 1 week before surgery, then 2 weeks and 3 months after the procedure. A statistical analysis was performed for 10 patients who received, on the average, a 350-ml injection of fat obtained during liposuction.
RESULTS: Gluteus muscle volume increased, reaching a higher level 2 weeks after the injection than the level 3 months afterward (p < 0.001). The gluteal circumference, modified 2 weeks after surgery by about 1 to 3 cm, came back to previous values 3 months after the procedure (p < 0.05), a phenomena interpreted as reabsorption and resolution of the postoperative edema. There is no correlation between the gluteus muscle volume obtained by MRI and the gluteal circumference (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings led to the conclusion that enhancement of the gluteal contour after fat injection results from survival of the injected tissue 3 months after the surgery, which was objectively evaluated by MRI as having a calculated reabsorption rate of 24% to 36%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16855890     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-005-0202-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  7 in total

Review 1.  Particle size in fat graft retention: A review on the impact of harvesting technique in lipofilling surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Trent M Gause; Russell E Kling; Wesley N Sivak; Kacey G Marra; J Peter Rubin; Lauren E Kokai
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography evaluation after autologous fat grafting in scar revision.

Authors:  D Bollero; S Pozza; E N Gangemi; A De Marchi; J Ganem; El Khatib A M; C Faletti; M Stella
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

3.  Autologous Fat Transfer for Esthetic Contouring of Face in Posttraumatic Nonfunctional Maxillofacial Deformities.

Authors:  Kapil S Agrawal; Manoj Bachhav; Charudatta S Naik; Harshwardhan Tanwar; Shilpa S Sankhe
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-11-05

4.  Assessment of facial autologous fat grafts using Dixon magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xueyin Liao; Xiaoqi Wang; Zhentan Xu; Shiwei Guo; Congmin Gu; Zhengyu Jin; Tong Su; Yu Chen; Huadan Xue; Mingyong Yang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-05

5.  Diffusion and perfusion: the keys to fat grafting.

Authors:  Roger K Khouri; Raoul-Emil R Khouri; Jorge R Lujan-Hernandez; Khalil R Khouri; Luca Lancerotto; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-10-07

6.  Prospective Controlled Study of Buttock Fat Transfer Using Ultrasound and Photographic Measurements.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-05-04

7.  The Impact of N-Acetylcysteine on Autologous Fat Graft: First-in-Human Pilot Study.

Authors:  Piotr Pietruski; Wiktor Paskal; Łukasz Paluch; Adriana M Paskal; Żaneta Nitek; Paweł Włodarski; Jerzy Walecki; Bartłomiej Noszczyk
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.326

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.