Literature DB >> 16854680

Satisfaction among women: differences between current users of barrier (male condom) and non-barrier methods.

Nihal Aladag1, Muge Filiz, Pinar Topsever, Petek Apaydin, Suleyman Gorpelioglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the differences in and factors related to satisfaction between barrier (male condom) and non-barrier method users.
METHODS: A semi-structured questionnaire was used for collecting data for this cross-sectional survey. The questionnaires were completed via one-on-one interviews by the researchers. The study group was selected using stratified random sampling. Exclusion criteria were, being unmarried, pregnant, in postmenopausal status and using traditional methods. A total of 434 currently married women using modern contraceptive methods participated in the study. Contraceptive users were dichotomized into two groups as non-barrier method users and barrier method users.
RESULTS: About half of the participants (n = 191, 44%) were barrier method users. Their mean age was 33.7 +/- 7.3 years, 66.6% (n = 131) were well educated and reported significantly less pregnancies, given births, living children and abortions (reproductive history events) than non-barrier users. Barrier method users were significantly more likely to be satisfied with their contraceptive method of choice (OR: 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-5.2). Among barrier method users, deciding the type of the contraceptive method themselves had significant effect on satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: In our study, satisfaction was mostly affected by heavy side effects and health risks of the methods resulting in less satisfaction with the contraceptive method among non-barrier method users. Other factors which may influence satisfaction deserve further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16854680     DOI: 10.1080/13625180500456916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  6 in total

1.  Satisfaction and discontinuation of contraception by contraceptive method among university women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ersek; Larissa R Brunner Huber; Michael E Thompson; Jan Warren-Findlow
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-05

2.  Experiences of vasectomy: a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Habibollah Hosseini; Fatemeh Abdi
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-12

3.  The association of contraceptive methods and depression.

Authors:  Soheila Ehsanpour; Arezo Aghaii; Gholam Reza Kheirabadi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2012-03

4.  Comparison of Sexual Dysfunction in Women Using Depo-Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA) and Cyclofem.

Authors:  Giti Ozgoli; Zohre Sheikhan; Mahrokh Dolatian; Masoumeh Simbar; Maryam Bakhtyari; Malihe Nasiri
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

5.  Comparing the satisfaction and efficacy of Cyclofem and contraceptive pills among females in Northern Iran: A randomized controlled trial study.

Authors:  Bita Jamali; Azade Kiapoor; Mozhgan Firoozbakht; Fatemeh Kazeminavaei; Fatemeh Taghlili
Journal:  J Adv Pharm Technol Res       Date:  2014-10

6.  A comparative study on satisfaction from hormonal contraceptives: depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), Cyclofem and LD.

Authors:  Nahid Fathizadeh; Fatemeh Abdi; Mitra Savabi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2011
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.